SORBS is very good at detecting stale lists, typo domains, and ... abusers
using your service. I'd prefer to not use it as a block, but certainly an
advice for filtering.
If you're the only one using an IP that got listed in SORBS, you need to
seriously rethink how often you are mailing your cust
sorbs is not always a consistent organization, both listing and delisting can
be chaotic, i don't think they have a policy based system, it has in the past
been based on reporting that is vetted only sporadically, you'd think mozilla
would only use dnsbl from larger organisations with a policy
On 6/17/2016 10:05 AM, wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)
wrote:
> [mozilla.org using SORBS as a veto]
>
> Looks like they disabled SORBS.
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1280451#c5
Yes, thankfully he reconsidered after I begged...
Thanks, and sorry for the noise...
.
Original Message
From: Tanstaafl
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 6:11 AM
To: postfix users
Subject: OT: dnsbl.sorbs.net - help explaining to Mozilla list maintainers why
outright blocking is bad
Hello,
I've been experiencing and on/off again problem with my shared dreamhost
account IP
[mozilla.org using SORBS as a veto]
Looks like they disabled SORBS.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1280451#c5
Wietse
Hello,
I've been experiencing and on/off again problem with my shared dreamhost
account IP block getting listed by SORBS.
The only reason I know this is because apparently the Mozilla list
maintainers have configured all of the Mozilla discussion lists to
outright BLOCK based on being listed by d
