On 8/12/21 14:41, Gerard E. Seibert wrote:
Have you made any attempt to get your IP 'whitelisted' with Microsoft?
Several attempts. If you know of a decent contact I can pursue it further, but even after fighting with their usual
ticket people and getting "mitigation" turned on for the
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 11:56:36 -0400, Matt Corallo stated:
>On 8/12/21 09:37, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Matt Corallo:
>>> I tried variations of this but never could get it to work - as far
>>> as I could tell the nexthop is fully resolved by the time we get to
>>> the smtp daemon, so there aren't
On 8/12/21 09:37, Wietse Venema wrote:
Matt Corallo:
I tried variations of this but never could get it to work - as far as I could
tell the nexthop is fully resolved by the
time we get to the smtp daemon, so there aren't any relevant settings to
override or otherwise set the default on the
Matt Corallo:
> I tried variations of this but never could get it to work - as far as I could
> tell the nexthop is fully resolved by the
> time we get to the smtp daemon, so there aren't any relevant settings to
> override or otherwise set the default on the
> nexthop there.
In the FILTER
I tried variations of this but never could get it to work - as far as I could tell the nexthop is fully resolved by the
time we get to the smtp daemon, so there aren't any relevant settings to override or otherwise set the default on the
nexthop there.
Thanks,
Matt
On 8/11/21 17:37, Wietse
Matt Corallo:
>
>
> On 8/11/21 16:52, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > If the sender address can override the routing, even if the recipient
> > would otherwise be delivered locally, then that would be a recipe
> > for mailer loops with the potential for mail explosions. This is
> > why we have
On 8/11/21 16:52, Wietse Venema wrote:
> If the sender address can override the routing, even if the recipient
> would otherwise be delivered locally, then that would be a recipe
> for mailer loops with the potential for mail explosions. This is
> why we have sender_dependent overrides for
Matt Corallo:
>
>
> On 8/11/21 13:54, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> >> On 11 Aug 2021, at 11:00 am, Matt Corallo wrote:
> >>
> >> Hmm, well I suppose consider this a feature request for
> >> sender_dependent_relay_transport_maps or sender_dependent_transport_maps :)
> >
> > No such feature fits
On 08-11-2021 4:41 pm, Matt Corallo wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it should still be possible to have a
sender-dependent lookup that happens before transport_maps or
relay_transport_maps? Indeed, I understand that no multi-key lookup
can occur, but the decision could be made first by an
On 8/11/21 13:54, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On 11 Aug 2021, at 11:00 am, Matt Corallo wrote:
Hmm, well I suppose consider this a feature request for
sender_dependent_relay_transport_maps or sender_dependent_transport_maps :)
No such feature fits into a single-key lookup design.
You're
Viktor Dukhovni:
> > On 11 Aug 2021, at 11:00 am, Matt Corallo wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, well I suppose consider this a feature request for
> > sender_dependent_relay_transport_maps or sender_dependent_transport_maps :)
>
> No such feature fits into a single-key lookup design.
>
> You're looking to
> On 11 Aug 2021, at 11:00 am, Matt Corallo wrote:
>
> Hmm, well I suppose consider this a feature request for
> sender_dependent_relay_transport_maps or sender_dependent_transport_maps :)
No such feature fits into a single-key lookup design.
You're looking to exempt specific sender (domains)
Hmm, well I suppose consider this a feature request for
sender_dependent_relay_transport_maps or sender_dependent_transport_maps :)
Matt
> On Aug 10, 2021, at 23:01, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:34:52PM -0400, Matt Corallo wrote:
>
>> I have a need to map some
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:34:52PM -0400, Matt Corallo wrote:
> I have a need to map some destination domains to a specific smtp
> nexthop, but need to override that nexthop on a sender_dependent
> basis. I've tried a few things and all with no luck:
Sorry, that's not directly possible.
Oh, and if its possible, is it also possible to specify the original domains as "any domain with an MX of $REGEX"
instead of only "any recipient domain of $REGEX"?
Thanks,
Matt
On 8/10/21 22:34, Matt Corallo wrote:
I have a need to map some destination domains to a specific smtp nexthop, but
I have a need to map some destination domains to a specific smtp nexthop, but need to override that nexthop on a
sender_dependent basis. I've tried a few things and all with no luck:
* transport_maps specifying the nexthop can't be overridden at all, it seems (and doesn't support
16 matches
Mail list logo
