Am 21.09.2014 um 03:12 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
> Am 21.09.2014 um 03:08 schrieb Wietse Venema:
>> li...@rhsoft.net:
> rpmbuild refuses :-(
You need a different patch for 2.11 and earlier. See
earlier follow-up
>>>
>>> thanks - after change the patch it get applied
>>>
>>> may
Am 21.09.2014 um 03:08 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> li...@rhsoft.net:
rpmbuild refuses :-(
>>>
>>> You need a different patch for 2.11 and earlier. See
>>> earlier follow-up
>>
>> thanks - after change the patch it get applied
>>
>> may take some time for feedback because postscreen
>> is so dam
li...@rhsoft.net:
> >> rpmbuild refuses :-(
> >
> > You need a different patch for 2.11 and earlier. See
> > earlier follow-up
>
> thanks - after change the patch it get applied
>
> may take some time for feedback because postscreen
> is so damned good in reject junk before smtpd :-)
To impers
Am 21.09.2014 um 02:43 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> li...@rhsoft.net:
>>
>> Am 21.09.2014 um 02:30 schrieb Wietse Venema:
>>> li...@rhsoft.net:
thank you - looks promising!
could you attach this as unified diff-file?
>>>
>>> The patch is unified diff format. It just does not have some o
li...@rhsoft.net:
>
> Am 21.09.2014 um 02:30 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > li...@rhsoft.net:
> >> thank you - looks promising!
> >>
> >> could you attach this as unified diff-file?
> >
> > The patch is unified diff format. It just does not have some of the
> > garbage that some version control syste
Wietse Venema:
> Does the following address the problem? This fixes the responses for:
>
> check_reverse_client_hostname_access
> check_reverse_client_hostname_a_access
> check_reverse_client_hostname_mx_access
> check_reverse_client_hostname_ns_access
>
> Basically, with all SMTP
Am 21.09.2014 um 02:30 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> li...@rhsoft.net:
>> thank you - looks promising!
>>
>> could you attach this as unified diff-file?
>
> The patch is unified diff format. It just does not have some of the
> garbage that some version control systems add around it. Let me know
> if
li...@rhsoft.net:
> thank you - looka promising!
>
> could you attach this as unified diff-file?
The patch is unified diff format. It just does not have some of the
garbage that some version control systems add around it. Let me know
if this is a problem.
Wietse
> that makes it easy to
thank you - looka promising!
could you attach this as unified diff-file?
that makes it easy to include it in rpmbuild for test/feedback
copy&paste usually damages something in patches
Am 21.09.2014 um 02:08 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Does the following address the problem? This fixes the responses
Does the following address the problem? This fixes the responses for:
check_reverse_client_hostname_access
check_reverse_client_hostname_a_access
check_reverse_client_hostname_mx_access
check_reverse_client_hostname_ns_access
Basically, with all SMTP server responses of the form
10 matches
Mail list logo