Re: PATCH: check_reverse_client_hostname_access: "unknown" in logs

2014-09-21 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 21.09.2014 um 03:12 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net: > Am 21.09.2014 um 03:08 schrieb Wietse Venema: >> li...@rhsoft.net: > rpmbuild refuses :-( You need a different patch for 2.11 and earlier. See earlier follow-up >>> >>> thanks - after change the patch it get applied >>> >>> may

Re: PATCH: check_reverse_client_hostname_access: "unknown" in logs

2014-09-20 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 21.09.2014 um 03:08 schrieb Wietse Venema: > li...@rhsoft.net: rpmbuild refuses :-( >>> >>> You need a different patch for 2.11 and earlier. See >>> earlier follow-up >> >> thanks - after change the patch it get applied >> >> may take some time for feedback because postscreen >> is so dam

Re: PATCH: check_reverse_client_hostname_access: "unknown" in logs

2014-09-20 Thread Wietse Venema
li...@rhsoft.net: > >> rpmbuild refuses :-( > > > > You need a different patch for 2.11 and earlier. See > > earlier follow-up > > thanks - after change the patch it get applied > > may take some time for feedback because postscreen > is so damned good in reject junk before smtpd :-) To impers

Re: PATCH: check_reverse_client_hostname_access: "unknown" in logs

2014-09-20 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 21.09.2014 um 02:43 schrieb Wietse Venema: > li...@rhsoft.net: >> >> Am 21.09.2014 um 02:30 schrieb Wietse Venema: >>> li...@rhsoft.net: thank you - looks promising! could you attach this as unified diff-file? >>> >>> The patch is unified diff format. It just does not have some o

Re: PATCH: check_reverse_client_hostname_access: "unknown" in logs

2014-09-20 Thread Wietse Venema
li...@rhsoft.net: > > Am 21.09.2014 um 02:30 schrieb Wietse Venema: > > li...@rhsoft.net: > >> thank you - looks promising! > >> > >> could you attach this as unified diff-file? > > > > The patch is unified diff format. It just does not have some of the > > garbage that some version control syste

Re: PATCH: check_reverse_client_hostname_access: "unknown" in logs

2014-09-20 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse Venema: > Does the following address the problem? This fixes the responses for: > > check_reverse_client_hostname_access > check_reverse_client_hostname_a_access > check_reverse_client_hostname_mx_access > check_reverse_client_hostname_ns_access > > Basically, with all SMTP

Re: PATCH: check_reverse_client_hostname_access: "unknown" in logs

2014-09-20 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 21.09.2014 um 02:30 schrieb Wietse Venema: > li...@rhsoft.net: >> thank you - looks promising! >> >> could you attach this as unified diff-file? > > The patch is unified diff format. It just does not have some of the > garbage that some version control systems add around it. Let me know > if

Re: PATCH: check_reverse_client_hostname_access: "unknown" in logs

2014-09-20 Thread Wietse Venema
li...@rhsoft.net: > thank you - looka promising! > > could you attach this as unified diff-file? The patch is unified diff format. It just does not have some of the garbage that some version control systems add around it. Let me know if this is a problem. Wietse > that makes it easy to

Re: PATCH: check_reverse_client_hostname_access: "unknown" in logs

2014-09-20 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
thank you - looka promising! could you attach this as unified diff-file? that makes it easy to include it in rpmbuild for test/feedback copy&paste usually damages something in patches Am 21.09.2014 um 02:08 schrieb Wietse Venema: > Does the following address the problem? This fixes the responses

PATCH: check_reverse_client_hostname_access: "unknown" in logs

2014-09-20 Thread Wietse Venema
Does the following address the problem? This fixes the responses for: check_reverse_client_hostname_access check_reverse_client_hostname_a_access check_reverse_client_hostname_mx_access check_reverse_client_hostname_ns_access Basically, with all SMTP server responses of the form