Re: Postfix 2.3.2 ignores return codes on send?

2008-09-26 Thread mouss
Michael Monnerie wrote: Dear list, this message was generated by the receiver postfix (2.2.1), where the sender postfix was 2.3.2 from openSUSE 10.2. The receiver's disk was temporarily full, which it announced correctly, but the sender ignored it and continued to try to send. Is this normal

Re: Postfix 2.3.2 ignores return codes on send?

2008-09-26 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Freitag, 26. September 2008 Wietse Venema wrote: Postfix sends you this transcript because of the Insufficient system storage problem, not because the client was using pipelining. Ah OK. But as it is a temporary message the sender gets, it retries very quick and often. And each time a

Re: Postfix 2.3.2 ignores return codes on send?

2008-09-26 Thread Charles Marcus
On 9/26/2008, Michael Monnerie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Could/Should the behaviour of postfix be changed to just send that warning every 15 or 30 minutes, not per message? That would be better for everybody I think, as it doesn't help to get 50 or 5000 messages that your disk is almost

Re: Postfix 2.3.2 ignores return codes on send?

2008-09-26 Thread PauAmma
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Charles Marcus wrote: On 9/26/2008, Michael Monnerie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Could/Should the behaviour of postfix be changed to just send that warning every 15 or 30 minutes, not per message? That would be better for everybody I think, as it doesn't help to get 50 or

Re: Postfix 2.3.2 ignores return codes on send?

2008-09-26 Thread Charles Marcus
On 9/26/2008 7:56 AM, PauAmma wrote: Could/Should the behaviour of postfix be changed to just send that warning every 15 or 30 minutes, not per message? That would be better for everybody I think, as it doesn't help to get 50 or 5000 messages that your disk is almost full. If 5000 messages

Postfix 2.3.2 ignores return codes on send?

2008-09-25 Thread Michael Monnerie
Dear list, this message was generated by the receiver postfix (2.2.1), where the sender postfix was 2.3.2 from openSUSE 10.2. The receiver's disk was temporarily full, which it announced correctly, but the sender ignored it and continued to try to send. Is this normal behaviour or did I