hai,
i used to have this configuration in my postfix
master.cf
127.0.0.1:12345 inet n n n - 0 spawn
user=nobody argv=/etc/postfix/blah.py
main.cf
127.0.0.1:12345_time_limit = 3600s
postfix never complaint about this configuration when i reload it.
Zitat von Hari Hendaryanto har...@csmcom.com:
hai,
i used to have this configuration in my postfix
master.cf
127.0.0.1:12345 inet n n n - 0 spawn
user=nobody argv=/etc/postfix/blah.py
main.cf
127.0.0.1:12345_time_limit = 3600s
postfix never complaint
* Hari Hendaryanto har...@csmcom.com:
hai,
i used to have this configuration in my postfix
master.cf
127.0.0.1:12345 inet n n n - 0 spawn
user=nobody argv=/etc/postfix/blah.py
main.cf
127.0.0.1:12345_time_limit = 3600s
This parameter does not
On 11/17/2011 4:27 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Hari Hendaryanto har...@csmcom.com:
hai,
i used to have this configuration in my postfix
master.cf
127.0.0.1:12345 inet n n n - 0 spawn
user=nobody argv=/etc/postfix/blah.py
main.cf
Stan Hoeppner:
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
1 /etc/postfix/master.cf:
2 127.0.0.1:9998 inet n n n - 0 spawn
3 user=nobody argv=/some/where/policy-server
4
5 /etc/postfix/main.cf:
6 smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
7
On 11/17/2011 6:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stan Hoeppner:
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
1 /etc/postfix/master.cf:
2 127.0.0.1:9998 inet n n n - 0 spawn
3 user=nobody argv=/some/where/policy-server
4
5 /etc/postfix/main.cf:
6
* Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
1 /etc/postfix/master.cf:
2 127.0.0.1:9998 inet n n n - 0 spawn
3 user=nobody argv=/some/where/policy-server
4
5 /etc/postfix/main.cf:
6 smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
7 ...
8
Hari Hendaryanto:
On 11/17/2011 6:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stan Hoeppner:
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
1 /etc/postfix/master.cf:
2 127.0.0.1:9998 inet n n n - 0 spawn
3 user=nobody argv=/some/where/policy-server
4
Wietse Venema:
Note #11. Does this mean this is still valid, or that the docs need
changing?
#11 is valid ONLY IF #2 exists. Without #2 it is a non-existent
parameter.
Wietse
yes sir, #2 does exist in my case...
Why don't you show the real evidence, instead of your
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:28:35 +0700
Hari Hendaryanto articulated:
On 11/17/2011 6:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stan Hoeppner:
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
1 /etc/postfix/master.cf:
2 127.0.0.1:9998 inet n n n - 0
spawn 3
On 11/17/2011 7:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Hari Hendaryanto:
On 11/17/2011 6:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stan Hoeppner:
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
1 /etc/postfix/master.cf:
2 127.0.0.1:9998 inet n n n - 0 spawn
3
Wietse Venema:
Wietse Venema:
Wietse Venema:
Note #11. Does this mean this is still valid, or that the docs need
changing?
#11 is valid ONLY IF #2 exists. Without #2 it is a non-existent
parameter.
Wietse
yes sir, #2 does exist in my case...
On 11/17/2011 8:06 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse Venema:
Wietse Venema:
Wietse Venema:
Note #11. Does this mean this is still valid, or that the docs need
changing?
#11 is valid ONLY IF #2 exists. Without #2 it is a non-existent
parameter.
Wietse
yes sir, #2 does exist in my
13 matches
Mail list logo
