> On Dec 13, 2017, at 3:38 AM, Jonathan Sélea wrote:
>
> Recently stumpled upon BIMI;
>
> https://authindicators.github.io/rfc-brand-indicators-for-message-identification/#rfc.section.3
>
> What is your view on it? I think that BIMI is more a cosmetic thing rather
> than something that preve
Jonathan S?lea:
> Recently stumpled upon BIMI;
>
> https://authindicators.github.io/rfc-brand-indicators-for-message-identification/#rfc.section.3
>
> What is your view on it? I think that BIMI is more a cosmetic thing
> rather than something that prevent spoofing.
>
> Is there any plans to imp
Jonathan,
BIMI adds an URI as header to a message. It is supposed to point to a
location, where mail clients can download an image, which is supposed to
show a brand indicator, vulgo "logo".
Which kind of support would you expect from an MTA such as Postfix?
p@rick
Am 13.12.2017 um 09:38 schri
Recently stumpled upon BIMI;
https://authindicators.github.io/rfc-brand-indicators-for-message-identification/#rfc.section.3
What is your view on it? I think that BIMI is more a cosmetic thing
rather than something that prevent spoofing.
Is there any plans to implement support for it in postf
