On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 07:27:59AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
[begin hostility]
> >>> You're making incorrect assumptions about the usefulness of software
> >>> based solely on revision numbers, of which you apparently have little or
> >>> no understanding.
[end hostility]
[begin sarcasm]
> >>>Y
Stan Hoeppner:
> On 5/15/2013 7:21 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Viktor Dukhovni:
> >> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:37:14PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >>
> >>> You're making incorrect assumptions about the usefulness of software
> >>> based solely on revision numbers, of which you apparently have l
On 5/15/2013 7:21 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni:
>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:37:14PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>>> You're making incorrect assumptions about the usefulness of software
>>> based solely on revision numbers, of which you apparently have little or
>>> no understandi
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:37:14PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> > You're making incorrect assumptions about the usefulness of software
> > based solely on revision numbers, of which you apparently have little or
> > no understanding. You must be a very wealthy man, as you mo
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:37:14PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> You're making incorrect assumptions about the usefulness of software
> based solely on revision numbers, of which you apparently have little or
> no understanding. You must be a very wealthy man, as you most certainly
> buy a new ca
On 5/15/2013 5:08 PM, Postfix wrote:
> Thanks, I am misunderstanding how postfix handles mail. I had assumed
> incoming mail is put into the hold folder, then from there any filtering
> software like amavis or mailscanner would pick it up scan it then pass it
> back to postfix where it would then
--On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 3:08 PM -0700 Postfix
wrote:
Thanks, I am misunderstanding how postfix handles mail. I had assumed
incoming mail is put into the hold folder, then from there any filtering
software like amavis or mailscanner would pick it up scan it then pass it
back to postfix whe
Wietse Venema:
> Postfix:
> > The passwd file is world readable.
> >
> > The question is, what happens to mail after it is put into the
> > postfix/hold folder?
>
> There is no message in the queue. Postfix NEVER ACCEPTED THE MAIL.
>Oops, if the message came from a content filter, there will b
Wietse Venema:
> Postfix:
> > The passwd file is world readable.
> >
> > The question is, what happens to mail after it is put into the postfix/hold
> > folder?
>
> There is no message in the queue. Postfix NEVER ACCEPTED THE MAIL.
Oops, if the message came from a content filter, there will be
a
Postfix:
> The passwd file is world readable.
>
> The question is, what happens to mail after it is put into the postfix/hold
> folder?
There is no message in the queue. Postfix NEVER ACCEPTED THE MAIL.
Wietse
rmor, et c.
issues. Another possible guess is that you're using one of the Linux
distributions which unwisely changed the upstream Postfix default of
no chrooted services in master.cf.
> The question is, what happens to mail after it is put into the
> postfix/hold folder?
Is it? I t
: Postfix not speaking with amavis?
Postfix:
> postfix/sendmail[29314]: fatal: no login name found for user ID 1095
Wietse:
> Some process with UID=1095 invoked the Postfix sendmail command.
Postfix:
> I assume this is why my mail is not being delivered, but how does a
> process use a
Postfix:
> postfix/sendmail[29314]: fatal: no login name found for user ID 1095
Wietse:
> Some process with UID=1095 invoked the Postfix sendmail command.
Postfix:
> I assume this is why my mail is not being delivered, but how does a process
> use a non existing user id?
Perhaps the Postfix send
what is using it?
This is a new setup with not much on it.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 8:26 AM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Postfix not speaking with amavis
Postfix:
> I have a feeling it has something to do with this:
>
> postfix/sendmail[29314]: fatal: no login name found for user ID 1095
Some process with UID=1095 invoked the Postfix sendmail command.
> Why is postfix trying to use a non existing user? I did not compile it with
Wrong question.
?
From: Kizito Thomas [mailto:manmes2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 8:23 PM
To: Postfix
Subject: RE: Postfix not speaking with amavis?
Chances are high that amavis starts scanning the mail but never stops and
thus the mail never leaves the hold queu, try commenting out amavis
nal Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Noel Jones
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 3:09 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Postfix not speaking with amavis?
On 5/9/2013 4:43 PM, Postfix wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if
On 5/9/2013 4:43 PM, Postfix wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if this is the wrong list.
>
>
>
> I have a debian system, installed the amavis packages etc following
> one of the many how toos.
>
>
>
> I installed postfix from source. Everything seems to work ok, no
> error message in logs.
>
> Howe
Hi,
Sorry if this is the wrong list.
I have a debian system, installed the amavis packages etc following one of
the many how toos.
I installed postfix from source. Everything seems to work ok, no error
message in logs.
However, incoming and outgoing email just sits in the postfix/hold fol
19 matches
Mail list logo