Re: Bcc field not transmitted to applicative layer

2012-06-20 Thread Larry Stone
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Wael MANAI wrote: I read the thread but I don't understand if it's possible to have Bcc parameter in the header of the message. You do understand that the B in BCC means BLIND, right? It wouldn't be very blind if the BCC information were included in the message data. Th

Re: Bcc field not transmitted to applicative layer

2012-06-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.06.2012 15:57, schrieb Wael MANAI: > I read the thread but I don't understand if it's possible to have Bcc > parameter in the header of the message. no because BCC is never in the headers this would break BCC per definition what BCC is signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signatu

Re: Bcc field not transmitted to applicative layer

2012-06-20 Thread Wael MANAI
I read the thread but I don't understand if it's possible to have Bcc parameter in the header of the message. Here is an extract of the message sent (wireshark tcp stream): 220 relay.com ESMTP Postfix (2.8.7) EHLO origin.gprs 250-relay.com 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 1024 250-VRFY 250-ETRN 250-ENH

Re: Bcc field not transmitted to applicative layer

2012-06-20 Thread Wietse Venema
Wael MANAI: > Hi, > > I use Postfix in MMS sending/receiving and some MMS can contain Bcc > parameter. I have configured Postfix to send all the messages to an > external program (using pipe mechanism) which treat the MMS. The problem > is when the MMS sent has one or more Bcc, Postfix delete them