Hello Wietse:
29. Jan 2015 21:02 by wie...@porcupine.org:
> Postfix could do this automatically, but it is too late for
> the upcoming stable release to make such a change.
>
Only knowing the info is good for now!
If it is some day done automatically then that I think would be usefull.
srach:
> Hello Wietse
>
> 29. Jan 2015 20:49 by wie...@porcupine.org:
>
> > submission inet n - n - - smtpd
> > -o syslog_name=postfix/submission
> > ...
> > smtps inet n - n - - smtpd
> > -o syslog_name=postfix/smtps
> > ...
>
Hello Wietse
29. Jan 2015 20:49 by wie...@porcupine.org:
> submission inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o syslog_name=postfix/submission
> ...
> smtps inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o syslog_name=postfix/smtps
> ...
>
> The same could be done wi
srach:
> I think it is strange in the Postfix log it is showing only the 'smtp'
> service name not the 'relay2' name.? It was some misdirection for me.? May be
You could use the same trick as the submission and smtpd examples
in master.cf:
submission inet n - n - -
It is like I said that I did this to myself. I was looking under the wrong
cup in the Shell Game!
Yesterday I had a change to trasnport from 'pf-out' not over the open
internet only over my private internet with a VPN. I did this with reading a
posting from another person.
I changed the http
With the testing by both telnet and openssl s_client I can see the TLS as the
available option but I see too the "None" cipher.
I am suspecting this though confusing.
I will first read more on the testing with these tools and understanding the
meaning of the logging reply for them. I also see
Hello Patrick
29. Jan 2015 19:37 by p...@sys4.de:
> The problem is probaly in the lines above in your log. Have you tried to
> reload postfix (to get a clear offset in the log)
Yes many times.
> and then telnet to
> 127.0.0.1?
>
Before I am complaining some more times I will first e
