Louis-David Mitterrand:
Hi,
I am using an (insanely) long pcre (see below) to reject
african/chinese/etc. spam that relays through large ISP's. An now it
seems I have reached a limit. When trying to add a single more
expression with a set of () parens I get this error:
postmap:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:54:47 +0200
Von: Louis-David Mitterrand vindex+lists-postfix-us...@apartia.org
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: max length of pcre rule?
Hi,
Hello,
I am using an (insanely) long pcre (see below) to reject
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:35:49 +0200
Von: Steve stev...@gmx.net
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: max length of pcre rule?
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:54:47 +0200
Von: Louis-David Mitterrand vindex
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:38:17PM +0200, Steve wrote:
Ohhh boy. Now looking at the regexp I see an error. Every line
starting with /[^:]*.+ should be replaced by /[^:]*:.+. Sorry for
that.
Hi Steve,
You if/endif suggestion for the prefix is interesting.
For added safety, the
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:44:58 +0200
Von: Louis-David Mitterrand vindex+lists-postfix-us...@apartia.org
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: max length of pcre rule?
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:38:17PM +0200, Steve wrote:
Ohhh boy. Now
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:13:31AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Louis-David Mitterrand:
Hi,
I am using an (insanely) long pcre (see below) to reject
african/chinese/etc. spam that relays through large ISP's. An now it
seems I have reached a limit. When trying to add a single more
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:44:58 +0200
Von: Louis-David Mitterrand vindex+lists-postfix-us...@apartia.org
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: max length of pcre rule?
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:38:17PM +0200, Steve wrote:
Ohhh boy. Now
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:12:58 +0200
Von: Steve stev...@gmx.net
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: max length of pcre rule?
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:44:58 +0200
Von: Louis-David Mitterrand vindex
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:55:19PM +0200, Steve wrote:
You if/endif suggestion for the prefix is interesting.
For added safety, the individual rules should be anchored with ^ and the
bracketed atom plussed, no?
/^[^:]+:.+
Yes. You are right. But to be honest this should be enough
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 05:16:39PM +0200, Steve wrote:
Ach. Again. I made errors. Sorry. It's hard to write here in such a
small edit box in a web interface. The above is not 100% correct. What
I wanted to write is:
You need the 'itsalltext' firefox extension to edit any web textarea
with
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 05:17:22PM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:55:19PM +0200, Steve wrote:
You if/endif suggestion for the prefix is interesting.
For added safety, the individual rules should be anchored with ^ and the
bracketed atom plussed, no?
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:00:36 +0300
Von: Henrik K h...@hege.li
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: max length of pcre rule?
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 05:17:22PM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:55:19PM +0200
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:13:15PM +0200, Steve wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:00:36 +0300
Von: Henrik K h...@hege.li
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: Re: max length of pcre rule?
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 05:17:22PM +0200, Louis-David
13 matches
Mail list logo
