Stan Hoeppner put forth on 1/22/2010 1:28 AM:
> I've wondered for a couple of months why my rbl check is being skipped. I've
> not seen a spamhaus entry in my logs since Sept 25 '09. Interestingly,
> postgrey
> is being called now and then, and it is after the rbl check in main.cf. Any
> idea w
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> 1. Spamhaus has banned Google Public DNS resolver queries.
Stan,
Do you have a good enough reason to not run your own name resolver on
your front MX machine?
IMO relying on third parties for DNS on an MX is bad design.
Mikael
Stan Hoeppner:
> 1. Spamhaus has banned Google Public DNS resolver queries. I
> didn't know this until today. If Postfix is using Google Public
> DNS resolvers, rbl queries to zen.spamhaus.org fail but Postfix
> (Debian Lenny 2.5.5-1.1) logs NOTHING about it. Not the query
> attempt, not the fa
Mikael Bak put forth on 1/22/2010 7:50 AM:
> Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>> 1. Spamhaus has banned Google Public DNS resolver queries.
>
> Stan,
> Do you have a good enough reason to not run your own name resolver on
> your front MX machine?
>
> IMO relying on third parties for DNS on an MX is bad d
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 08:34:35AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Mikael Bak put forth on 1/22/2010 7:50 AM:
> > Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >>
> >> 1. Spamhaus has banned Google Public DNS resolver queries.
> >
> > Stan,
> > Do you have a good enough reason to not run your own name resolver on
> > you
On 1/22/2010 6:18 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
1. Spamhaus has banned Google Public DNS resolver queries. I didn't know this
until today. If Postfix is using Google Public DNS resolvers, rbl queries to
zen.spamhaus.org fail but Postfix (Debian Lenny 2.5.5-1.1) logs NOTHING about
it. Not the quer
Kenneth Marshall put forth on 1/22/2010 8:39 AM:
> pdns-recursor 3.1.7.2 is easy to configure/use and has a tuneable
> resource footprint.
Got her installed, configured, up and running. Let's see if this improves this
spamhaus situation, and a handful a day of other dns related errors I've been
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:40:03AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Kenneth Marshall put forth on 1/22/2010 8:39 AM:
>
> > pdns-recursor 3.1.7.2 is easy to configure/use and has a tuneable
> > resource footprint.
>
> Got her installed, configured, up and running. Let's see if this improves
> this
Noel Jones put forth on 1/22/2010 10:00 AM:
> Nothing is logged because the DNS server gives an authoritive "does not
> exist" answer. That's not an error, it is the expected response when a
> client is not listed in an RBL.
Hi Noel,
I was not venting at Postfix, or Wietse, or any of the devs f
On 22/01/2010 16:58, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
My venting should be aimed at Spamhaus. What they've done here is the opposite
of transparency. In the case of Google DNS, Spamhaus has pulled something a bit
underhanded in my estimation. They don't want people using Google DNS to query
Spamhaus zone
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
My venting should be aimed at Spamhaus. What they've done here is the opposite
of transparency. In the case of Google DNS, Spamhaus has pulled something a bit
underhanded in my estimation. They don't want people using Google DNS to query
Spamhaus zone
Mark Goodge put forth on 1/22/2010 11:07 AM:
> It's not the fault of
> Spamhaus, Google or Postfix if people don't RTFM.
I'll give you that. I'd been using zen for years, and sbl-xbl for years before
that. When I changed my resolvers to Google from my current provider's (for
performance reasons,
On 1/22/2010 10:58 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Noel Jones put forth on 1/22/2010 10:00 AM:
Nothing is logged because the DNS server gives an authoritive "does not
exist" answer. That's not an error, it is the expected response when a
client is not listed in an RBL.
Hi Noel,
I was not venting a
13 matches
Mail list logo