D G Teed wrote:
[snip]
I'm afraid this is misunderstood, or I didn't explain it carefully enough.
The ISP sending the bounce notification is my home ISP, not
the ISP for my work. At home I run a small postfix
which relays all outbound to my home's Cable ISP's SMTP.
The Cable ISP's SMTP
])
by acadiau.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54454E4E1
for x; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:02:22 -0400 (AST)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: ingelbert joachim x
To: x
Subject: ID MSG:81531 I am Julia, 27 y.o. Russia (dating)
Is there anything more I can be doing?
Does anyone feel Spamcop's position
On 11/13/2008, D G Teed ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'll report the smtpd related details here so those who
want to know how it is set up can see.
postconf -n output is preferred... all of it...
--
Best regards,
Charles
feel Spamcop's position on backscatter too simplistic?
no evidence, no conclusion.
anyone feel Spamcop's position on backscatter too simplistic?
no evidence, no conclusion.
Here is what they say...
http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/329.html#bounces
--Donald
D G Teed wrote:
We send non-delivery responses. If someone emailed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], it will reject,
saying that user doesn't exist. Our users expect this feature.
If we told them bad addresses will cause email to be lost without
notification, they would not be happy.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Charles Marcus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On 11/13/2008, D G Teed ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'll report the smtpd related details here so those who
want to know how it is set up can see.
postconf -n output is preferred... all of it...
OK - IP, domain,
is a lreay server and you can't get the
relay_recipient_maps, then you can use reject_unverified_recipient (only
for selected domains).
Does anyone feel Spamcop's position on backscatter too simplistic?
no evidence, no conclusion.
Here is what they say...
http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:14 PM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
D G Teed wrote:
What makes you believe I'm listed? I got a single report
of a complaint. Have you not used the spamcop
web interface before?
never ever. should I?
No, but as you said, some people report the wrong problem
D G Teed wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:14 PM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If someone emailed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], it
will reject,
saying that user doesn't exist. Our users expect this feature.
D G Teed wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:14 PM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We send non-delivery responses.
if these are user does not exist or filter thinks this is spam/virus
and the like, then you are a backscatter source.
I don't think we send NDRs as emails originating here.
I think
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
D G Teed wrote:
We user virtual_alias_maps and
smtpd_client_restrictions = reject_unlisted_recipient
is at the beginning of our list of restrictions.
client restrictions are checked on connect.
In the default setup (smtpd_delay_reject=yes), client, helo,
12 matches
Mail list logo
