Telus is so broken in several ways. I complain and the friendly support person
acts as if nothing is wrong.
As I understand it, you need to be sending to their SMTP server from 'within
their network'. Either on their LTE or on their home/business internet service.
So when you leave your wifi o
On 2017-05-25 03:20 PM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
Right from the Telus website :
--
"Clear the Requires a secure connection (SSL) check box"
"Authenticate using: Clear text"
http://business.telus.com/en/business/support/global/how-to/how-to-set-up-your-email-on-any-computer
---
Se
the advice to their business customers.
Original Message
From: Phil Stracchino
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 9:31 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: TLS warning
On 05/25/17 12:28, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Yes, I cannot image why members of the so called 'five-eyes'
> c
On 05/25/17 12:28, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Yes, I cannot image why members of the so called 'five-eyes'
> consortium would not actively promote signal security among their
> populations.
>
> Must be an oversight.
Or a lack thereof
--
Phil Stracchino
Babylon Communications
ph...@caerl
On Thu, May 25, 2017 05:23, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
>
>
> This paper is a good read on email security. It goes into the various
> means that a man in the middle can reduce security, one of which is
> enabled by selecting opportunistic encryption. (Of which in all
> practicality you don't have
> On May 25, 2017, at 5:23 AM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
>
> "Neither Snow Nor Rain Nor MITM . . .
> An Empirical Analysis of Email Delivery Security"
> https://jhalderm.com/pub/papers/mail-imc15.pdf
> Video by one of the authors.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aogXeTbERs
It is a good acad
> On May 25, 2017, at 5:23 AM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
>
> Given the email issues in recent political campaigns, I'm seeing a
> number of articles suggesting setting up DMARC for quarantine.
DMARC is an abuse of the IETF process (informational RFC) to promote
and deploy a deeply flawed speci
On Thu, 25 May 2017 03:02:39 -0400
Rick Leir wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-05-25 02:31 AM, Philip Paeps wrote:
> > On 2017-05-24 14:54:34 (+0200), Bastian Blank
> > wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 02:41:01AM -0700, li...@lazygranch.com
> >> wrote:
> >>> You shouldn't be accepting sslv3 due to the
On 2017-05-25 02:31 AM, Philip Paeps wrote:
On 2017-05-24 14:54:34 (+0200), Bastian Blank
wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 02:41:01AM -0700, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
You shouldn't be accepting sslv3 due to the poodle attack.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/POODLE
Please explain how exact
On 2017-05-24 14:54:34 (+0200), Bastian Blank
wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 02:41:01AM -0700, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
You shouldn't be accepting sslv3 due to the poodle attack.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/POODLE
Please explain how exactly SMTP is exploitable using POODLE?
There a
Viktor, LazyG
This is not nonsense, as I learned something from it. Now I will go and check
whether it is enabled.
And thanks for mentioning foundations and family etc. That is also useful.
Maybe we should be a bit more polite to other folks in the list, we are mostly
'in the same boat'.
Cheers
> On May 24, 2017, at 5:30 AM, Rick Leir wrote:
>
> Should this TLS warning worry me?
No.
> May 23 11:35:43 myHostName postfix/smtpd[6619]: SSL_accept error from
> sonic310-27.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com[66.163.186.208]: 0
> May 23 11:35:43 myHostName postfix/smtpd[6619]: wa
> On May 24, 2017, at 5:41 AM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
>
> You shouldn't be accepting sslv3 due to the poodle attack.
>
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/POODLE
>
> A search should indicate what to change to reject sslv3.
>
> Of course there still could be other things that need fixing. ;
55 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: TLS warning
Hi Lists
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 02:41:01AM -0700, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
> You shouldn't be accepting sslv3 due to the poodle attack.
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/POODLE
Please explain how exactly SMTP is exploita
Hi Lists
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 02:41:01AM -0700, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
> You shouldn't be accepting sslv3 due to the poodle attack.
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/POODLE
Please explain how exactly SMTP is exploitable using POODLE?
Bastian
--
Worlds are conquered, galaxies destroyed
2:31 AM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: TLS warning
Hi All
Should this TLS warning worry me?
cheers -- Rick
Warnings
smtpd (total: 1)
1 TLS library problem: error:14094416:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTE...
mail.log:
May 23 11:35:42 myHostName postfix/smtpd[6619]: connect
Hi All
Should this TLS warning worry me?
cheers -- Rick
Warnings
smtpd (total: 1)
1 TLS library problem: error:14094416:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTE...
mail.log:
May 23 11:35:42 myHostName postfix/smtpd[6619]: connect from
sonic310-27.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
17 matches
Mail list logo
