LOCAL(8) DELIVERY RIGHTS says: "Deliveries to external files and
external commands are made with the rights of the receiving user on
whose behalf the delivery is made."
So I put "nottheoilrig: /mnt/nottheoilrig/" in /etc/aliases (alias_maps)
thinking mail for user nottheoilrig would be deliver
* Jack Bates :
> LOCAL(8) DELIVERY RIGHTS says: "Deliveries to external files and
> external commands are made with the rights of the receiving user on
> whose behalf the delivery is made."
>
> So I put "nottheoilrig: /mnt/nottheoilrig/" in /etc/aliases (alias_maps)
> thinking mail for user not
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Jack Bates :
> > LOCAL(8) DELIVERY RIGHTS says: "Deliveries to external files and
> > external commands are made with the rights of the receiving user on
> > whose behalf the delivery is made."
> >
> > So I put "nottheoilrig: /mnt/nottheoilrig/" in /etc/aliases (alias_ma
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> In the absence of a user context, the local(8) daemon uses the owner
> rights of the :include: file or alias database. When those files are
> owned by the superuser, delivery is made with the rights specified
> with the default_privs configuration parameter.
>
> That's pro
On 25/02/16 08:20 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
* Jack Bates :
LOCAL(8) DELIVERY RIGHTS says: "Deliveries to external files and
external commands are made with the rights of the receiving user on
whose behalf the delivery is made."
So I put "nottheoilrig: /mnt/nottheoilrig/"
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:16:43AM -0800, Jack Bates wrote:
> Hmmm ... That is what's happening, but why's there no user context?
> I expected the first case ("the rights of the receiving user on whose
> behalf the delivery is made") vs. the second ("the absence of a user
> context").
Entries in
Jack Bates:
> On 25/02/16 08:20 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Ralf Hildebrandt :
> >> * Jack Bates :
> >>> LOCAL(8) DELIVERY RIGHTS says: "Deliveries to external files and
> >>> external commands are made with the rights of the receiving user on
> >>> whose behalf the delivery is made."
> >>>
>
On 26/02/16 08:57 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:16:43AM -0800, Jack Bates wrote:
Hmmm ... That is what's happening, but why's there no user context?
I expected the first case ("the rights of the receiving user on whose
behalf the delivery is made") vs. the second ("the