On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 21:36:58 -0800
Steve Jenkins st...@stevejenkins.com articulated:
[snip]
In getting our newsletter campaigns ready to send, we believe we've
done everything all the big ESPs ask: a relatively up-to-date version
of Postfix (2.3.3), a dedicated IP with a good reputation and no
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 21:36 -0800, Steve Jenkins wrote:
This is a best practices question for other Postfix users who may be using
Postfix to send email to large opt-in mailing lists.
snip
So with all that explained, I have few questions:
1) What's the optimal way for us to process the
Happy New Year to you all.
This is a best practices question for other Postfix users who may be using
Postfix to send email to large opt-in mailing lists.
We have a subscriber list of 1MM+ registered members of a popular video game
website. The vast majority of them are also opted in for our
Hi all,
Our mail server is configured to use special envelope sender addresses
for some outgoing mail so that bounces can be processed automatically.
The bounce processor is a self-made script. Are there any hints what
to look for in a bounced mail to be sure, that it really is a bounce
caused
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 06:52 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stefan Palme:
Hi all,
Our mail server is configured to use special envelope sender addresses
for some outgoing mail so that bounces can be processed automatically.
The bounce processor is a self-made script. Are there any hints
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:39:41PM +0200, mouss wrote:
- try to parse your postfix logs for invalid addresses.
This way, you can ignore bounces
Why do you want to pull data you normally get pushed free house?
because parsing the logs is trivial compared to parsing a
mouss:
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 01:39:41PM +0200, mouss wrote:
- try to parse your postfix logs for invalid addresses.
This way, you can ignore bounces
Why do you want to pull data you normally get pushed free house?
because parsing the logs is trivial compared
