On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 14:29:13 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:06:28PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Is there a straightforward (i.e. relatively painless) way to check the
header from, reply-to, and message-id domains against dbl.spamhaus.org
Is there a straightforward (i.e. relatively painless) way to check the
header from, reply-to, and message-id domains against dbl.spamhaus.org
and reject on a positive reply as with reject_r*bl_client?
Without having to write a content filter to be called in action
filter:nexthop in
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:06:28PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Is there a straightforward (i.e. relatively painless) way to check the
header from, reply-to, and message-id domains against dbl.spamhaus.org
and reject on a positive reply as with reject_r*bl_client?
Not from Postfix. There is
On 08/30/2010 02:06 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Is there a straightforward (i.e. relatively painless) way to check the
header from, reply-to, and message-id domains against dbl.spamhaus.org
and reject on a positive reply as with reject_r*bl_client?
Without having to write a content filter to be
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:06:28PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Is there a straightforward (i.e. relatively painless) way to check the
header from, reply-to, and message-id domains against dbl.spamhaus.org
and reject on a positive reply as with reject_r*bl_client?
Not
Wietse Venema put forth on 8/30/2010 1:29 PM:
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:06:28PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Is there a straightforward (i.e. relatively painless) way to check the
header from, reply-to, and message-id domains against dbl.spamhaus.org
and reject on a positive
Stan Hoeppner:
Wietse Venema put forth on 8/30/2010 1:29 PM:
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:06:28PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Is there a straightforward (i.e. relatively painless) way to check the
header from, reply-to, and message-id domains against dbl.spamhaus.org
