Marek Kozlowski wrote:
> My system is not overloaded and - in many aspects quite typical one.
Great! I believe you. But then there was absolutely no reason to
double a limit that would never have been hit. If the system is not
overloaded the the initial fork() will always succeed and there will
:-)
On 2/7/21 11:29 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Marek Kozlowski wrote:
No, such configurable limits are great. My question was different. I suppose
that many many years ago, many versions ago I had some problem with this
server and I tried to solve it or apply a quick fix by incrementing the
limit. U
Marek Kozlowski wrote:
> Have you ever read you own code (or quick fixes) written >5 years
> ago if you'd forgotten to place comments? ;-)
I often say, "I miss my younger brain." Back then I could remember
all of the details. These days I write notes to my future self. My
future self who will r
Marek Kozlowski:
> :-)
>
> On 2/7/21 10:00 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Marek Kozlowski:
> >> :-)
> >>
> >> I'm working on simplification, adding comments and brushing up my
> >> main.cf. I've just found the following entry:
> >&g
:-)
On 2/7/21 10:00 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Marek Kozlowski:
:-)
I'm working on simplification, adding comments and brushing up my
main.cf. I've just found the following entry:
fork_attempts=10
Seems to be added manually so there was some reason for it.
How many people
Marek Kozlowski:
> :-)
>
> I'm working on simplification, adding comments and brushing up my
> main.cf. I've just found the following entry:
>
> fork_attempts=10
>
> Seems to be added manually so there was some reason for it.
How many people h
:-)
I'm working on simplification, adding comments and brushing up my
main.cf. I've just found the following entry:
fork_attempts=10
Seems to be added manually so there was some reason for it.
Unfortunately there is no comment on it in the file. The documentation
is very short:
