On 08/21/2014 02:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Marek Kozlowski:
>> Why didn't I have such error during the `RCPT TO:' phase? Why did it
>> "partially" worked - solved and continued to the `DATA' phase not failed
>> at all?
>
> That works "by accident" and is not promised by any documentation,
> th
Marek Kozlowski:
> Why didn't I have such error during the `RCPT TO:' phase? Why did it
> "partially" worked - solved and continued to the `DATA' phase not failed
> at all?
That works "by accident" and is not promised by any documentation,
therefore you should not rely on it.
Wietse
:-)
> The documented lookup key for local aliases(5) in the local(8)
> delivery agent is the bare localpart of the address "m.kozlowski"
> not "m.kozlow...@poczta.mini.pw.edu.pl".
>
> You're likely to have more luck with LDAP-based address to address
> rewriting via virtual_alias_maps not alias_m
:-)
> The documented lookup key for local aliases(5) in the local(8)
> delivery agent is the bare localpart of the address "m.kozlowski"
> not "m.kozlow...@poczta.mini.pw.edu.pl".
>
> You're likely to have more luck with LDAP-based address to address
> rewriting via virtual_alias_maps not alias_m
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 08:54:19AM +0200, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
> :-)
> I have an openldap server for accounts and other servers use pam_ldap.
> We'd like to to store e-mail aliases as an LDAP `mail' attribute.
>
> A user with a common name `temp1' has the attribute `mail' set to
> `m.kozlow...@p
:-)
I have an openldap server for accounts and other servers use pam_ldap.
We'd like to to store e-mail aliases as an LDAP `mail' attribute.
A user with a common name `temp1' has the attribute `mail' set to
`m.kozlow...@poczta.mini.pw.edu.pl'. Expected behavior: mail sent to
`m.kozlow...@poczta.mi
