Re: postscreen: DNSBL rank not seen in logs for some ip addresses

2015-12-17 Thread btb
On 2015.12.16 11.35, Wietse Venema wrote: The client was not listed at some DNSBL this explains it, thanks. i don't know why, but i was expecting postscreen to tell me that the client was not listed. i now see in the docs that it's only logged if postscreen_dnsbl_threshold is met. -ben

Re: postscreen: DNSBL rank not seen in logs for some ip addresses

2015-12-16 Thread Wietse Venema
btb: > hi- > > i've become accustomed to seeing log passages like this: > > >grep -iF '[142.4.19.85]:52366' mail.log > Dec 16 09:41:09 mta1 postfix/postscreen[27678]: CONNECT from > [142.4.19.85]:52366 to [10.3.70.6]:25 > Dec 16 09:41:15 mta1 postfix/postscreen[27678]: DNSBL rank 5 for > [142.

postscreen: DNSBL rank not seen in logs for some ip addresses

2015-12-16 Thread btb
hi- i've become accustomed to seeing log passages like this: >grep -iF '[142.4.19.85]:52366' mail.log Dec 16 09:41:09 mta1 postfix/postscreen[27678]: CONNECT from [142.4.19.85]:52366 to [10.3.70.6]:25 Dec 16 09:41:15 mta1 postfix/postscreen[27678]: DNSBL rank 5 for [142.4.19.85]:52366 Dec 16 0