Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-11 Thread Chris
2012/2/11 Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com: On 2/10/2012 12:44 PM, Chris wrote: 2012/2/10 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de: The deep inspection and postscreen isn't enabled as well (I think) You mean the deep protocol tests?  Can I disable these deep protocol tests in

postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Chris
Hello Postfix Users :) I noticed: http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#after_220 When a good client passes the deep protocol tests, postscreen(8) adds the client to the temporary whitelist but it cannot hand off the live connection to a Postfix SMTP server process in the middle of

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 07:11:50PM +0100, Chris wrote: I noticed: http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#after_220 When a good client passes the deep protocol tests, postscreen(8) adds the client to the temporary whitelist but it cannot hand off the live connection to a Postfix

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Chris
2012/2/10 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de: * Chris xchris...@googlemail.com: Hello Postfix Users :) I noticed: http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#after_220 When a good client passes the deep protocol tests, postscreen(8) adds the client to the temporary whitelist

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Chris xchris...@googlemail.com: If you let the MX share one memcache instance, the second MX to receive a connection will immediately accept it. Works like a charm here. Okay, I see. That would be a solution. How did you realize that? On both my boxes I'm using:

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Chris: Hello Postfix Users :) I noticed: http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#after_220 When a good client passes the deep protocol tests, postscreen(8) adds the client to the temporary whitelist but it cannot hand off the live connection to a Postfix SMTP server process in

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Chris
2012/2/10 /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk: On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 07:11:50PM +0100, Chris wrote: I noticed: http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#after_220 When a good client passes the deep protocol tests, postscreen(8) adds the client to the temporary whitelist but it cannot hand

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Chris xchris...@googlemail.com: Read a bit more. It IS disabled unless you specifically enable it. Postscreen? Or what do you mean? The deep inspection and postscreen isn't enabled as well (I think) -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité -

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Chris
2012/2/10 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de: * Chris xchris...@googlemail.com: If you let the MX share one memcache instance, the second MX to receive a connection will immediately accept it. Works like a charm here. Okay, I see. That would be a solution. How did you realize

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Chris
2012/2/10 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de: * Chris xchris...@googlemail.com: Read a bit more. It IS disabled unless you specifically enable it. Postscreen? Or what do you mean? The deep inspection and postscreen isn't enabled as well (I think) You mean the deep protocol

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Chris xchris...@googlemail.com: The deep inspection and postscreen isn't enabled as well (I think) You mean the deep protocol tests? The stuff with the deep in it, yes Can I disable these deep protocol tests in postscreen? By default they're not enabled :) according to

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Chris: 2012/2/10 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de: * Chris xchris...@googlemail.com: Read a bit more. It IS disabled unless you specifically enable it. Postscreen? Or what do you mean? The deep inspection and postscreen isn't enabled as well (I think) You mean the

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Chris
2012/2/10 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de: * Chris xchris...@googlemail.com: The deep inspection and postscreen isn't enabled as well (I think) You mean the deep protocol tests? The stuff with the deep in it, yes Can I disable these deep protocol tests in postscreen? By

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Chris
2012/2/10 Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org: Chris: 2012/2/10 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de: * Chris xchris...@googlemail.com: Read a bit more. It IS disabled unless you specifically enable it. Postscreen? Or what do you mean? The deep inspection and postscreen

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 2/10/2012 12:44 PM, Chris wrote: 2012/2/10 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de: The deep inspection and postscreen isn't enabled as well (I think) You mean the deep protocol tests? Can I disable these deep protocol tests in postscreen? I find it interesting that you ignored