Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-11 Thread Chris
2012/2/11 Stan Hoeppner : > On 2/10/2012 12:44 PM, Chris wrote: >> 2012/2/10 Ralf Hildebrandt : > >>> The "deep inspection" and postscreen isn't enabled as well (I think) >> >> You mean the "deep protocol tests"?  Can I disable these "deep >> protocol tests" in postscreen? > > I find it interesting

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 2/10/2012 12:44 PM, Chris wrote: > 2012/2/10 Ralf Hildebrandt : >> The "deep inspection" and postscreen isn't enabled as well (I think) > > You mean the "deep protocol tests"? Can I disable these "deep > protocol tests" in postscreen? I find it interesting that you ignored Wietse's response,

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Chris
2012/2/10 Wietse Venema : > Chris: >> 2012/2/10 Ralf Hildebrandt : >> > * Chris : >> > >> >> > Read a bit more. It IS disabled unless you specifically enable it. >> >> >> >> Postscreen? Or what do you mean? >> > >> > The "deep inspection" and postscreen isn't enabled as well (I think) >> >> You mea

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Chris
2012/2/10 Ralf Hildebrandt : > * Chris : > >> > The "deep inspection" and postscreen isn't enabled as well (I think) >> >> You mean the "deep protocol tests"? > > The stuff with the "deep" in it, yes > >> Can I disable these "deep protocol tests" in postscreen? > > By default they're not enabled :)

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Chris : > > The "deep inspection" and postscreen isn't enabled as well (I think) > > You mean the "deep protocol tests"? The stuff with the "deep" in it, yes > Can I disable these "deep protocol tests" in postscreen? By default they're not enabled :) according to http://www.postfix.org/POST

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Chris: > 2012/2/10 Ralf Hildebrandt : > > * Chris : > > > >> > Read a bit more. It IS disabled unless you specifically enable it. > >> > >> Postscreen? Or what do you mean? > > > > The "deep inspection" and postscreen isn't enabled as well (I think) > > You mean the "deep protocol tests"? Can I d

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Chris
2012/2/10 Ralf Hildebrandt : > * Chris : > >> > Read a bit more. It IS disabled unless you specifically enable it. >> >> Postscreen? Or what do you mean? > > The "deep inspection" and postscreen isn't enabled as well (I think) You mean the "deep protocol tests"? Can I disable these "deep protocol

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Chris
2012/2/10 Ralf Hildebrandt : > * Chris : > >> > If you let the MX share one memcache instance, the second MX to >> > receive a connection will immediately accept it. Works like a charm >> > here. >> >> Okay, I see. That would be a solution. >> >> How did you realize that? > > On both my boxes I'm u

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Chris : > > Read a bit more. It IS disabled unless you specifically enable it. > > Postscreen? Or what do you mean? The "deep inspection" and postscreen isn't enabled as well (I think) -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Cam

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Chris
2012/2/10 /dev/rob0 : > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 07:11:50PM +0100, Chris wrote: >> I noticed: >> >> http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#after_220 >> >> > When a good client passes the deep protocol tests, postscreen(8) >> > adds the client to the temporary whitelist but it cannot hand >> >

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Wietse Venema
Chris: > Hello Postfix Users :) > > I noticed: > > http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#after_220 > > > When a good client passes the deep protocol tests, postscreen(8) adds > > the client to the temporary whitelist but it cannot hand off the > > "live" connection to a Postfix SMTP serv

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Chris : > > If you let the MX share one memcache instance, the second MX to > > receive a connection will immediately accept it. Works like a charm > > here. > > Okay, I see. That would be a solution. > > How did you realize that? On both my boxes I'm using: postscreen_cache_map = memcache:/e

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Chris
2012/2/10 Ralf Hildebrandt : > * Chris : >> Hello Postfix Users :) >> >> I noticed: >> >> http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#after_220 >> >> > When a good client passes the deep protocol tests, postscreen(8) adds >> > the client to the temporary whitelist but it cannot hand off the >> >

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 07:11:50PM +0100, Chris wrote: > I noticed: > > http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#after_220 > > > When a good client passes the deep protocol tests, postscreen(8) > > adds the client to the temporary whitelist but it cannot hand > > off the "live" connection t

Re: postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Chris : > Hello Postfix Users :) > > I noticed: > > http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#after_220 > > > When a good client passes the deep protocol tests, postscreen(8) adds > > the client to the temporary whitelist but it cannot hand off the > > "live" connection to a Postfix SMTP s

postscreen = undesired greylisting ???

2012-02-10 Thread Chris
Hello Postfix Users :) I noticed: http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html#after_220 > When a good client passes the deep protocol tests, postscreen(8) adds > the client to the temporary whitelist but it cannot hand off the > "live" connection to a Postfix SMTP server process in the middle