Re: postscreen vs. fail2ban

2015-03-13 Thread Istvan Prosinger
Hi Wietse, One benefit of using fail2ban (for me) is a definitely cleaner mail log for these cases. Regards, Istvan On 12.3.2015 2:30, Wietse Venema wrote: Michael Fox: I haven't implemented postscreen yet, but plan to. So this question is for the postscreen experts here. As I

RE: postscreen vs. fail2ban

2015-03-12 Thread Michael Fox
Sebastian, Wietse, Noel: thanks for your responses re Postscreen vs. Fail2ban. Michael

postscreen vs. fail2ban

2015-03-11 Thread Michael Fox
I haven't implemented postscreen yet, but plan to. So this question is for the postscreen experts here. As I understand it from the documentation, postscreen protects postfix from having to deal with most attack vectors, including higher volume attacks. So, does it make sense to also use

Re: postscreen vs. fail2ban

2015-03-11 Thread Noel Jones
On 3/11/2015 7:43 PM, Michael Fox wrote: I haven’t implemented postscreen yet, but plan to. So this question is for the postscreen experts here. As I understand it from the documentation, postscreen protects postfix from having to deal with most attack vectors, including higher volume

Re: postscreen vs. fail2ban

2015-03-11 Thread Wietse Venema
Michael Fox: I haven't implemented postscreen yet, but plan to. So this question is for the postscreen experts here. As I understand it from the documentation, postscreen protects postfix from having to deal with most attack vectors, including higher volume attacks. So, does it make sense