On Dec 1, 2008, at 11:11 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:35:18PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
Did you see header_checks documented as a supported parameter in
http://www.postfix.org/smtpd.8.html (rhetorical question, the answer
is no). A closer look at the documentation sh
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:35:18PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> >Did you see header_checks documented as a supported parameter in
> >http://www.postfix.org/smtpd.8.html (rhetorical question, the answer
> >is no). A closer look at the documentation shows this ia feature of
> >the cleanup service:
>
On Dec 1, 2008, at 12:17 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 06:40:18PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
I tried it like this:
10.0.0.1:smtps inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o
smtpd_recipient_restrictions
=permit_sasl_authenticated
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 06:40:18PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> I tried it like this:
>
> 10.0.0.1:smtps inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
> -o
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions
> =permit_sasl_authenticated,reject_unauth_desti
> -o smtpd_sasl
On Nov 30, 2008, at 4:13 PM, mouss wrote:
Dan Langille a écrit :
Following one from John's success, I'm failing. One difference
between
John's setup and mine is my header_checks directive. It was
defined in
master.cf:
-o header_checks=pcre:/usr/local/etc/postfix/obscure_smtp_auth
did
Dan Langille a écrit :
> Following one from John's success, I'm failing. One difference between
> John's setup and mine is my header_checks directive. It was defined in
> master.cf:
>
> -o header_checks=pcre:/usr/local/etc/postfix/obscure_smtp_auth
>
did you add that to an smtpd service? see
john mickler wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It should work if the newline is part of a ${n} sub-pattern match:
# ${3} matches Newline + folding white-space
/^(Received): (.*?)(\n[\t\x20])(.*)$/
${1}: ${2}${3}(my comment)${3}$
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:22 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> john mickler a écrit :
>> The pcre example above indeed passes the newline through as mentioned.
>> Here's an adjusted expression to fit my situation, as well as an
>> example header after the replacement:
>>
>> main.cf:
>> heade
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:18:45PM -0500, john mickler wrote:
> /^(Received): (.*?)(\n[\t\x20])(.*)$/ REPLACE ${1}: from smtp-auth
> (smtp-auth.mycompany.com [55.55.55.55]${3}${4}
>
>
> resulting replaced header-
>
> Received: from smtp-auth (smtp-auth.mycompany.com [55.55.55.55]
> (usi
john mickler a écrit :
> The pcre example above indeed passes the newline through as mentioned.
> Here's an adjusted expression to fit my situation, as well as an
> example header after the replacement:
>
> main.cf:
> header_checks = /usr/local/etc/postfix/maps/header_checks.pcre
>
> header_chec
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It should work if the newline is part of a ${n} sub-pattern match:
>
># ${3} matches Newline + folding white-space
>/^(Received): (.*?)(\n[\t\x20])(.*)$/
>${1}: ${2}${3}(my comment)${3}${4}
>
> With t
Victor Duchovni:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:24:25PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> > john mickler wrote:
> > >
> > >As for the newline insertion mentioned on the website, I'm wondering
> > >if using a pcre instead of standard regex would allow this. I'm going
> > >to translate and give it a try.
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:24:25PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> john mickler wrote:
> >
> >As for the newline insertion mentioned on the website, I'm wondering
> >if using a pcre instead of standard regex would allow this. I'm going
> >to translate and give it a try.
>
> Don't bother. The postfix
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
john mickler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a question pertaining to message headers on outbound mail from
remote smtp auth'd clients. I have been asked to adjust our mail systems to
"anonymize" said remote c
john mickler wrote:
As for the newline insertion mentioned on the website, I'm wondering
if using a pcre instead of standard regex would allow this. I'm going
to translate and give it a try.
Don't bother. The postfix REPLACE action does not support
newlines in headers regardless of the map
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You need REPLACE, not REWRITE.
>
> See http://riseuplabs.org/privacy/postfix/; ignore the patch section and
> scroll down to "Postfix 2.3 and later". Copy and modify as necessary to
> meet your needs.
Thanks for the poin
Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sahil Tandon wrote:
>> john mickler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I have a question pertaining to message headers on outbound mail from
>>> remote smtp auth'd clients. I have been asked to adjust our mail systems to
>>> "anonymize" said remote clients
Sahil Tandon wrote:
john mickler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a question pertaining to message headers on outbound mail from
remote smtp auth'd clients. I have been asked to adjust our mail systems to
"anonymize" said remote clients. Using mail sent from an Iphone as an example,
the head
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 15:17 -0700, john mickler wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a question pertaining to message headers on outbound mail from
> remote smtp auth'd clients. I have been asked to adjust our mail
> systems to
> "anonymize" said remote clients. Using mail sent from an Iphone as an
> e
john mickler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a question pertaining to message headers on outbound mail from
> remote smtp auth'd clients. I have been asked to adjust our mail systems to
> "anonymize" said remote clients. Using mail sent from an Iphone as an
> example,
> the headers on the r
Hi All,
I have a question pertaining to message headers on outbound mail from
remote smtp auth'd clients. I have been asked to adjust our mail systems to
"anonymize" said remote clients. Using mail sent from an Iphone as an example,
the headers on the receiving end show:
Received: from [10.176.
21 matches
Mail list logo
