Le 08/09/2010 10:44, Jan-Frode Myklebust a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 06:38:15PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
If you have customers sending large amounts of abusive mail, seems
as if there would be better ways to deal with that eg. sender
quotas, monitoring of undeliverable mail, inbound spam/
Le 07/09/2010 23:36, Jan-Frode Myklebust a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:20:36PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/07/2010 06:57 PM, mouss wrote:
OP is an ISP providing outbound relay to residential users. his
problem is not easy to solve.
Thanks for understanding. I´ve gotten informat
On 09/08/2010 12:36 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:20:36PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/07/2010 06:57 PM, mouss wrote:
OP is an ISP providing outbound relay to residential users. his
problem is not easy to solve.
Thanks for understanding. I´ve gotten informa
Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
>
>> and I still fail to understand how controlling your customers
>> envelope sender will help with backscatterer.org.
>
> It will make sure that when viruses/malware on the customers computer is
> sending out spam from fake addresses, the bounces goes back to the
> cu
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 06:38:15PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> If you have customers sending large amounts of abusive mail, seems
> as if there would be better ways to deal with that eg. sender
> quotas, monitoring of undeliverable mail, inbound spam/virus
> scanning, etc. But I'm not an ISP; I can
On 9/7/2010 4:36 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:20:36PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 09/07/2010 06:57 PM, mouss wrote:
OP is an ISP providing outbound relay to residential users. his
problem is not easy to solve.
Thanks for understanding. I´ve gotten informatio
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:20:36PM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 09/07/2010 06:57 PM, mouss wrote:
> >
> >OP is an ISP providing outbound relay to residential users. his
> >problem is not easy to solve.
> >
Thanks for understanding. I´ve gotten information off list that gmail
are setting the s
On 09/07/2010 06:57 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 07/09/2010 16:17, Noel Jones a écrit :
On 9/7/2010 2:32 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 06:29:28PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
I fail to see how controlling your users From: addresses will affect
a backscatterer.org listing.
I'm t
Le 07/09/2010 16:17, Noel Jones a écrit :
On 9/7/2010 2:32 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 06:29:28PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
I fail to see how controlling your users From: addresses will affect
a backscatterer.org listing.
I'm thinking we can accept sending some bac
On 9/7/2010 2:32 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 06:29:28PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
I fail to see how controlling your users From: addresses will affect
a backscatterer.org listing.
I'm thinking we can accept sending some backscatter to our own
customers, at least as l
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 06:29:28PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> I fail to see how controlling your users From: addresses will affect
> a backscatterer.org listing.
I'm thinking we can accept sending some backscatter to our own
customers, at least as long as it's authenticated backscatter and we c
-authenticate
and hopefully postfix can then set envelope sender = sasl-authenticated
user.
I fail to see how controlling your users From: addresses will
affect a backscatterer.org listing.
Or maybe set envelope sender = sasl-authenticated user *if* the
sender isn't found i
envelope sender = sasl-authenticated
user.
Or maybe set envelope sender = sasl-authenticated user *if* the
sender isn't found in the smtpd_sender_login_maps.
Is this feasible ?
-jf
13 matches
Mail list logo
