[pfx] Re: surprise with strict_mime_encoding_domain

2023-04-04 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 09:00:16PM +0200, A. Schulze via Postfix-users wrote: > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/signed; > boundary="mua-name=_some_random"; > protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; > micalg=sha-256 > Content-Transfer-Encoding:

[pfx] surprise with strict_mime_encoding_domain

2023-04-04 Thread A. Schulze via Postfix-users
Hello, an SMTP Server with strict_mime_encoding_domain=yes blocked some messages (which was ... unexpected) # postconf mail_version mail_version = 3.7.4 # postconf -n alias_maps = maillog_file = /dev/stdout smtpd_recipient_restrictions = defer strict_mime_encoding_domain = yes # postconf -M

strict_mime_encoding_domain

2008-08-14 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
Pretend I'm an idiot. (For most people who know me this won't be hard.) Could somebody please explain to me... in a way that takes into account my idiocy... what this strict_mime_encoding_domain option actually does, i.e. if you turn it on? What exactly constitutes invalid Content-Transfer

Re: strict_mime_encoding_domain

2008-08-14 Thread Wietse Venema
Ronald F. Guilmette: Pretend I'm an idiot. (For most people who know me this won't be hard.) Could somebody please explain to me... in a way that takes into account my idiocy... what this strict_mime_encoding_domain option actually does, i.e. if you turn it on? It stops some malformed