On 24 Jul 2018, at 11:31, dur...@mgtsciences.com wrote:
I had it white-listed here.
postscreen_access_list = permit_mynetworks,
cidr:/etc/postfix/postscreen_access.cidr
So why was it not passed?
Because postscreen and smtpd are distinct programs that have independent
(but compatibly conf
owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org wrote on 07/24/2018 09:35:39 AM:
> From: Viktor Dukhovni
> To: Postfix users
> Date: 07/24/2018 09:36 AM
> Subject: Re: How to white list
> Sent by: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
>
>
>
> > On Jul 23, 2018, at 7
> On Jul 23, 2018, at 7:04 PM, Allen Coates wrote:
>
> anything white-listed by postscreen will bypass client restrictions also
That's not correct.
--
Viktor.
owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org wrote on 07/23/2018 05:04:45 PM:
> From: Allen Coates
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Date: 07/23/2018 05:05 PM
> Subject: Re: How to white list
> Sent by: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
>
>
>
> On 23/07/18 21:17, dur...@mgtsci
pens
> up more spam. So how
> do I white list the ip for smtpd?
>
> Jul 23 13:53:32 postfix/smtpd[16279]: Anonymous TLS connection established
> from unknown[65.100.117.244]: TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA
> (256/256 bits)
> Jul 23 13:53:32 postfix/smtpd[16279]: NOQUEU
On 23 Jul 2018, at 16:17 (-0400), dur...@mgtsciences.com wrote:
Jul 23 13:53:32 postfix/smtpd[16279]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[65.100.117.244]: 450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find
your
reverse hostname, [65.100.117.244]; from=
[...]
smtpd_client_restrictions = reject_unknow
REJECT
> From: Durwin De La Rue/Mgtsciences/US
> To: Postfix users
> Date: 07/23/2018 02:17 PM
> Subject: How to white list
>
> I have whitelisted the ip in postscreen_access.cidr. I can see the
> 'whitelisted' for postscreen in log.
> But it does
I have whitelisted the ip in postscreen_access.cidr. I can see the
'whitelisted' for postscreen in log.
But it does not get past smtpd.
I do not want to remove reject_invalid_helo_hostname as this really opens
up more spam. So how
do I white list the ip for smtpd?
Jul 23 13:53:
Yes, that accords with my understanding. (And I'll take another look at
that README.) Thank you.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Bill Cole <
postfixlists-070...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote:
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 17:54, J. Johnson wrote:
>
> Incidentally, I do have "smtp_delay_reject = yes", whi
On 20 Apr 2017, at 17:54, J. Johnson wrote:
Incidentally, I do have "smtp_delay_reject = yes", which *delays* the
processing. But I appears that none of the smtpd_*_restrictions (if
specified) are skipped. Which I find handy for controlling how they
are
applied to different addresses.
Correc
I'm still a bit vague on some of this, but I think I have enough I can set
up some tests and figure it out . Thanks.
Incidentally, I do have "smtp_delay_reject = yes", which *delays* the
processing. But I appears that none of the smtpd_*_restrictions (if
specified) are skipped. Which I find handy
> On Apr 20, 2017, at 2:40 PM, J. Johnson wrote:
>
> I distrust access(5), but that's just a detail of db format; I think what you
> mean is the
> several access list checks available in the smtpd_*_restrictions.
The interface documented in access(5) is a database-independent key/value
abstrac
I distrust access(5), but that's just a detail of db format; I think what
you mean is the several access list checks available in the
smtpd_*_restrictions. As I replied to Philip, I think this depends on what
point in the delivery process postfix replicates the message for additional
recipients. Fr
I'm trying to do this in smptd_*_restrictions (I believe the header checks
are applied at a later stage, right?), and I know how use an access list to
whitelist. I'm just not confident that white-listing postmaster will *not*
white-list any other recipients. I think it comes down to wha
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 01:43:11AM -0700, J. Johnson wrote:
> A while back I was wondering why certain spammers kept hitting our
> 'postmaster' account, then i realized there were multiple recipients. It
> seems like the other recipients ride in on the back of 'postmaster', then
> are free to go t
On 2017-04-20 01:43:11 (-0700), J. Johnson wrote:
A while back I was wondering why certain spammers kept hitting our
'postmaster' account, then i realized there were multiple recipients.
It seems like the other recipients ride in on the back of 'postmaster',
then are free to go there individu
A while back I was wondering why certain spammers kept hitting our
'postmaster' account, then i realized there were multiple recipients. It
seems like the other recipients ride in on the back of 'postmaster', then
are free to go there individual ways. Does anyone know if that is true? And
if so, ho
Ruben Safir:
> WHat are some suggsted methods of whitelisting with postfix.
>
> I am throwing in the flag and want to prevent email to me without my
> specific permision, and to bounce the rest.
This does exactly what you ask, but you probably need more.
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtp_sender_r
WHat are some suggsted methods of whitelisting with postfix.
I am throwing in the flag and want to prevent email to me without my
specific permision, and to bounce the rest.
Ruben
--
So many immigrant groups have swept through our town
that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological
propor
hi all
how can i whitelist a particular user (infact it's a user account which
send virusalerts from the relays to the pop server) from smtp
authentication.
i've attached the postconf output
ty
help appreciated
-bharathan
inet_protocols = all
myhostname = mail.exmaple.com
myorigin = mail.examp
VR wrote:
> I don't grasp how
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions=
> check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/access_client
> check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/access_helo
>
> can equate to less whitelisting than:
>
> smtpd_client_restrictions=
> check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/access_client
>
>
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/18/2009 11:25 AM, VR wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/18/2009 10:41 AM, VR wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/15/2009 11:01 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ahhh, is this one of the reasons some folks put 'all' of their
restrictions under smtpd_recipient_restrictions (only have to lis
On 9/18/2009 11:25 AM, VR wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/18/2009 10:41 AM, VR wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/15/2009 11:01 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ahhh, is this one of the reasons some folks put 'all' of their
restrictions under smtpd_recipient_restrictions (only have to list
things once)?
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/18/2009 10:41 AM, VR wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/15/2009 11:01 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ahhh, is this one of the reasons some folks put 'all' of their
restrictions under smtpd_recipient_restrictions (only have to list
things once)?
Yes, exactly.
-- Noel Jones
Th
On 9/18/2009 10:41 AM, VR wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/15/2009 11:01 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ahhh, is this one of the reasons some folks put 'all' of their
restrictions under smtpd_recipient_restrictions (only have to list
things once)?
Yes, exactly.
-- Noel Jones
This raises a questio
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/15/2009 11:01 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ahhh, is this one of the reasons some folks put 'all' of their
restrictions under smtpd_recipient_restrictions (only have to list
things once)?
Yes, exactly.
-- Noel Jones
This raises a question for me...
If all the checks
On 9/15/2009 11:01 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ahhh, is this one of the reasons some folks put 'all' of their restrictions
under smtpd_recipient_restrictions (only have to list things once)?
Yes, exactly.
-- Noel Jones
Ahhh, is this one of the reasons some folks put 'all' of their restrictions
under smtpd_recipient_restrictions (only have to list things once)?
Thanks Noel.
--
Stan
Noel Jones put forth on 9/15/2009 9:27 AM:
> On 9/15/2009 8:58 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> I'd like to keep copies of all the spam
On 9/15/2009 8:58 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
I'd like to keep copies of all the spam coming into the address mentioned below. I
thought all that I needed was an "OK" in the access file to force acceptance of
all mail to this address. My attempt at whitelisting the address is not working. All m
I'd like to keep copies of all the spam coming into the address mentioned
below. I thought all that I needed was an "OK" in the access file to force
acceptance of all mail to this address. My attempt at whitelisting the address
is not working. All my anti-spam measures are still whacking spam
Jason Hirsh a écrit :
>
> On Jan 26, 2009, at 5:26 PM, mouss wrote:
>
>> Jason Hirsh a écrit :
>>>
>>> On Jan 26, 2009, at 5:04 PM, mouss wrote:
>>> [snip]
You probably want to ask on the amavisd list. but then give as much
details as you can (whether you restarted amavisd-new, ... etc)
On 26 Jan 2009, at 21:11, Jason Hirsh wrote:
...
PS. It is a bad idea to bounce mail that was queued by postfix. This
causes backscatter (and you may be blacklisted...)
I am confused by this comment.. do you mean I shouldn't let amavisd
do any bouncing??
it handles all of my spam, content a
On Jan 26, 2009, at 5:26 PM, mouss wrote:
Jason Hirsh a écrit :
On Jan 26, 2009, at 5:04 PM, mouss wrote:
[snip]
You probably want to ask on the amavisd list. but then give as much
details as you can (whether you restarted amavisd-new, ... etc).
I was told I should behere but all teh disc
Jason Hirsh a écrit :
>
> On Jan 26, 2009, at 5:04 PM, mouss wrote:
> [snip]
>> You probably want to ask on the amavisd list. but then give as much
>> details as you can (whether you restarted amavisd-new, ... etc).
>>
>
> I was told I should behere but all teh discussion Ihad on SPAM oretty much
, there's no way for exceptions.
I tried to white list them by adding
@whitelist_sender_maps = ( ['.example.org', '.example.net'] );
so I bet you block gif in amavisd-new?
sure did.blokced asan attachment
to amavisd.conf but exampl.net continues to get bou
ns.
> I tried to white list them by adding
>
> @whitelist_sender_maps = ( ['.example.org', '.example.net'] );
>
so I bet you block gif in amavisd-new?
>
> to amavisd.conf but exampl.net continues to get bounced with bad
> attachments.
>
> Any idea
I have blocked files with gif attachments to block that category of
spam.
I do however have some people who send me legitimate gif attachments
I tried to white list them by adding
@whitelist_sender_maps = ( ['.example.org', '.example.net'] );
to amavisd.conf but exampl.
37 matches
Mail list logo
