* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
I'll check the use of the smtp_fallback_relay for different mailing
campaigns.
machine epsilon:
Mails sent directly to MX:
==
56423 (93.7%)
Mails sent to fallback_relay:
=
3735 (6.2%)
Bounces
there :)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
This service was introduced with Postfix version 2.8.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
ralf.hildebra
)
That's why. Your server doesn't have an reverse DNS entry.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
ralf.hildebra
* LEON l...@kingdest.com:
Hi,
This is my static ip mail server,ISP give me the ip,and i install
the bind9 in this mail server,can you tell me how to do ?
You ISP needs to setup the reverse DNS entry (I guess).
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité
Province Network
country:CN
origin: AS17816
mnt-by: MAINT-CNCGROUP-RR
changed:ab...@cnc-noc.net 20060118
source: APNIC
So maybe try ab...@cnc-noc.net (although this seems to be a bit over
the top, rather contact your sales representative)
--
Ralf
* LEON l...@kingdest.com:
What command to get this information?
host -t ns 54.107.218.in-addr.arpa
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155
postscreen_dnsbl_sites = bl.spamcop.net, zen.spamhaus.org, cbl.abuseat.org
postscreen_greet_action = enforce
postscreen_non_smtp_command_enable = yes
two of them. postscreen_bare_newline_enable and
postscreen_non_smtp_command_enable
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité
* Chris Horry zer...@wibble.co.uk:
Ralf,
I knew I'd missed something, thanks for the clarification.
Those tests are useful, nonetheless :)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30
know these
either. What IS this?
aemsg is answered like this:
aemsg
500 Command unrecognized: Rejecting command, Not an AE box or source Not
Allowed
AE box? What's an AE box?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin
www.pimda.eu
Host www.pimda.eu not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
# host -t mx www.pimda.eu
Host www.pimda.eu not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
According to the docs, host By default, it looks for A, , and MX
records. But why am I getting three results? Usually I'm only getting
ONE!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
record and fails.
Basically ns1.bdm.microsoftonline.com says I'm not authoritative for
that, look at ns1.bdm.microsoftonline.com ... which is of course
broken.
That's the Microsoft way...
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
and dig + trace found me the entries.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de | http
.bdm.microsoftonline.com. 3600 IN 2a01:111:f406:1804::59
;; Query time: 122 msec
;; SERVER: 207.46.15.59#53(207.46.15.59)
;; WHEN: Wed Sep 19 12:35:13 2012
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 177
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
. IN
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
www.pimda.eu. 1 IN SOA ns1.bdm.microsoftonline.com.
msnhst.microsoft.com. 2007070100 10800 1800 691200 3600
NXDOMAIN, empty response set, authoritative (flags: aa)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung
nevertheless, since forwarding breaks
SPF. As a benefit it allows you to notice bounces and react accordingly.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155
stage, before pipelining is even
attempted.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de | http://www.charite.de
to documents or similar
that proves that there is a problem between the two operationg systems
with regard to TCP window scaling. This is the first time I hear about
this to be honest.
I was wondering about this as well. I mean, it doesn't happen THAT
often.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich
* Harakiri harakiri...@yahoo.com:
When trying to sent a mail to -u...@domain.com postfix will complain
allow_min_user = yes
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
* Alumno Etsii todos.somos...@gmail.com:
client.devels.es exists (and resolves), but r...@client.devels.es doesn't
$ host client.devels.es
Host client.devels.es not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
* Alumno Etsii todos.somos...@gmail.com:
2012/10/1 Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
* Alumno Etsii todos.somos...@gmail.com:
client.devels.es exists (and resolves), but root@client.devels.esdoesn't
$ host client.devels.es
Host client.devels.es not found: 3(NXDOMAIN
the smtp_concurrency_limit for these domains
without creating thousands of lines with
domainnametransport:
domainname domainname:
domainname is a copy of the smtp...smtp line in master, renamed to
domainname...smtp
and then use domainname_concurrency_limit
--
Ralf
if the user has
authenticated (sasl_username attribut is non-empty)
See
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
for the policy delegation stuff
See
http://www.postfix.org/access.5.html
for the FILTER: stuff
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité
msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.1.1#53(127.0.1.1)
;; WHEN: Wed Oct 3 22:21:22 2012
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 100
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax
sitting in the queues, doing nothing.
How would one deal with this?
1 of the domains in quetions is: opnet.net
opnet.net error:5.1.1 One cannot send mail there
in transport_maps
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus
has some thousand recors from the last 2 years
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
, but this combination has me
scratching my head. Is it doable?
The best thing I can think of would be a policy daemon which uses
libgeoip.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49
. Is it posible to configure that?
cat /etc/resolv.conf
postfix check
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
ralf.hildebra
. Configure the DNS on 127.0.0.1 to use itself for
RBL queries and XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY as forwarder
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570
, or if postfix
simply could be configured to look on this queue too.
Maybe you have postfix and sendmail installed side by side and
/bin/mail is using the sendmail's sendmail command
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus
acknowledgements.
Also something that Mailman does: If a post is held and later released
by an admin, one can receive a post acknowledgements (which only
makes sense when you're NOT a member or you disabled receiving mails.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité
* Prashanth P.Nair prashanth...@gmail.com:
Is it possible to Move any Emails to TMP Queue Directory if recipients are
more than 5 in Postfix 2.6 ?
What is the function of the TMP Queue Directory?
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz
* Prashanth P.Nair prashanth...@gmail.com:
Exact Requirement is ,If any email's have more than 10 recipient's ,I don't
want to deliver those mail's to recipient's instead of that I want to move
those email to tmp queue folder. Later then Administrator manually check
the tmp queue and process
* Prashanth P.Nair prashanth...@gmail.com:
ok..Is it Possible Hold the queue If recipient Limit is more than 10
Yes.
and
process the HOLD queue using Perl script?
You can use mailq to get queueIDs and then use postcat postsuper
from perl.
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46
* Ram r...@netcore.co.in:
The problem is when the mail has been on my postfix relay server for
5 days and then the mail bounces back, postfix does not log for
which recipient the mail failed
Really? What DOES it say?
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße
* Sahil Tandon postfix-users@postfix.org:
In Postfix 2.10 Snapshot 20121022, conf/post-install tests whether
smtpd_relay_restrictions is already set with:
test -n `$POSTCONF -c $config_directory -nh smtpd_relay_restrictions`
This evaluates to false when smtpd_relay_restrictions is
* Tobia Conforto tobia.confo...@gruppo4.eu:
Hello
Can I configure Postfix 2.7 to only run check_policy_service for SASL
authenticated emails?
Not really. You can if SASL authenticated email come in via an
alternate port.
As an alternative you can make your policy daemon CHECK for the
* Fred Ho f...@fredho.net:
Hi,
I am running Postfix version 2.5.6 on RedHat 4 and is experiencing
periodic duplicated mails.The RedHat mailserver is the mailhub
receiving incoming mails from the ISP and forward mails to the
internal mail server. Occasionally, users are complaining receiving
* Fred Ho f...@fredho.net:
Hi,
There's the SonicWall FW in between. What should I look for?I have the LAN
MTU = 1420 on the RedHat server matching that of the ISP router.
I thought it might have something to do with smtp protocol fixup,
which is horrible broken on PIX/ASA firewalls.
Oct
* Fred Ho f...@fredho.net:
Hi,
Between 10:15:17 and 13:04:23 there's no 4803D7F20 related items like that of
F097C7F1F.
Oct 31 10:15:14 mailgate2 postfix/smtp[9660]: 2C9897F20:
to=chen...@crownever.com.cn, relay=outbound10.ttasia.com[210.17.183.10]:25,
delay=2.2, delays=0.05/0/0.05/2.1,
* thorso...@lavabit.com thorso...@lavabit.com:
Hi,
I'm getting the following connections from suspicious IPs.
$ sudo more /var/log/mail.info
DATE MACHINE postfix/smtpd[PID]: connect from unknown[IP]
DATE MACHINE postfix/smtpd[PID]: lost connection after UNKNOWN from
unknown[IP]
DATE
* Alex mysqlstud...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I have a fc15 server with postfix-2.8.10 and have enabled postscreen.
I've enabled it before without any difficulty, so I'm not sure what
I'm doing wrong in this case. For some reason it is printing these
errors periodically:
Oct 31 23:41:15 portal
* Alex mysqlstud...@gmail.com:
cat /etc/resolv.conf
postfix check
what's the output of those?
It's set up to use the local caching server,
good. Which server is the caching server asking?
and doesn't otherwise
have any resolution issues. Even when I try to resolve that host using
* /dev/rob0 postfix-users@postfix.org:
I'm not saying it is a bad idea. It might even be something for
Wietse to consider if/when work begins on a non-compatible Postfix
3.0. I think it would be difficult to ensure downgradability with
such a feature.
I sure is a way of making the config
* Prashanth P.Nair prashanth...@gmail.com:
Thanks for the advise.
I found that we can achieve this using header_check .
# restrict based on message header content header_checks =
pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks
/etc/postfix/header_checks:
/^To:([^@]*@){1,}/HOLD Sorry, your
* /dev/rob0 postfix-users@postfix.org:
But what happens when some smartaleck uses an @ sign in the RFC
5322 display-name field, as I did, above?
It will break.
Joe@work j...@example.com
Joe@home j...@example.com
Amen to that. I've seen that even in the From: header!
--
[*] sys4 AG
* Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr:
On 8/11/2012 2:42 μμ, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
So, I conclude that in this case there is no such cache because
reject_unverified_recipient is at the end of
smtpd_recipient_restrictions, so in essence it is never used...
Now that I re-think it over, in fact
* Prashanth P.Nair prashanth...@gmail.com:
How to re-write From: My Self mys...@thisdomain.com to From: My Self
mys...@thatdomain.com using regexp .
I know the sender_canonical_maps changes both the envelop sender address
and header sender address according to the sender_canonical_classes.
* prashuppp p prashanthpnai...@gmail.com:
I was trying to HOLD all the emails which has more then 2 recipient's
using header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks
/^(Cc|To):([^@]*@){2,}/ HOLD
header_checks only apply (AS THE NAME SAYS!) to... the headers.
No header, no match.
But not
* prashanth p prashanthpnai...@gmail.com:
ok..great..Is there any other method to do for envelope also..I need it for
both..
You'd need a policy_daemon for that. Didn't you ask that before?
postfwd can easily do that.
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15,
* Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com:
is there any way that i can collect reports in which i can check who
is the sender who is the receiver what was the mail subject, if
You can log this using
header_checks with:
/^Subject:/ WARN
and mime_header_checks with:
/filename=\(.*)\.(...)\$/
* Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com:
and mime_header_checks with:
/filename=\(.*)\.(...)\$/ WARN Attachment $1.$2
Thanks for the help. but any suggestion for the attachment size.
Not possible with postfix alone. If you put Amavis in the loop, you
get to see the attachment names
* Muhammad Yousuf Khan sir...@gmail.com:
i am using my ISP relay. and i don't receive NDRs for any invalid or
unknown account. is this default. or i must be doing some config
mistakes.
Maybe your ISP relay is blocking bounces.
however, in log files i can see that my message has been relayed
* Patric Falinder patric.falin...@omg.nu:
So it's not possible to have Postfix listening on another port with
different settings, like skipping the authentication bit and have it
act like an open relay?
Well of course:
-o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=...
-o ...
--
[*] sys4 AG
* Noel Jones postfix-users@postfix.org:
On 11/28/2012 1:17 PM, Will Yardley wrote:
[Apologies in advance for the less than complete information below;
hoping someone may have an idea of what's happening anyway]
I'm having a problem where messages are accepted but then seem to
generate
I'm seeing a DNS problem I cannot fathom:
# host 65.171.152.29
Host 29.152.171.65.in-addr.arpa not found: 2(SERVFAIL)
Hm. So who's authoritative?
# host -t ns 171.65.in-addr.arpa
171.65.in-addr.arpa name server ns1-auth.sprintlink.net.
171.65.in-addr.arpa name server ns3-auth.sprintlink.net.
* Muzaffer Tolga Özses to...@ozses.net:
Hi,
I'm getting the log entry in my to=root@/etc/mailname, relay=none,
delay=0, delays=0/0/0/0, dsn=5.1.3, status=bounced (bad address
syntax). Googling says I should add allow_min_users = yes, which I
would like to confirm.
root@/etc/mailname is
* Ralf Hildebrandt r...@sys4.de:
* Muzaffer Tolga Özses to...@ozses.net:
Hi,
I'm getting the log entry in my to=root@/etc/mailname, relay=none,
delay=0, delays=0/0/0/0, dsn=5.1.3, status=bounced (bad address
syntax). Googling says I should add allow_min_users = yes, which I
would
* Ralf Hildebrandt r...@sys4.de:
* Ralf Hildebrandt r...@sys4.de:
* Muzaffer Tolga Özses to...@ozses.net:
Hi,
I'm getting the log entry in my to=root@/etc/mailname, relay=none,
delay=0, delays=0/0/0/0, dsn=5.1.3, status=bounced (bad address
syntax). Googling says I should add
* Robert Schetterer r...@sys4.de:
Am 30.11.2012 11:44, schrieb Tomas Macek:
I cannot apply firewall rules on 587, because our clients travel with
their notebooks and still want to send their emails through our mailserver.
use fail2ban etc for blocking dynamic, brute force attacks to
* d.davo...@mastertraining.it d.davo...@mastertraining.it:
This is from /var/log/syslog:
Dec 4 15:13:41 mail2 postfix/smtpd[26204]: 4E21EA735A:
client=unknown[192.168.2.203]
Dec 4 15:13:41 mail2 postfix/cleanup[26207]: 4E21EA735A:
* d.davo...@mastertraining.it d.davo...@mastertraining.it:
Dec 4 15:13:41 mail2 postfix/smtp[26167]: 4E21EA735A:
to=e.bos...@mastervoice.it, relay=none, delay=0.1,
delays=0.1/0/0/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for mastervoice.it loops
back to myself)
What is the result of
% host -t mx
* ml m...@smtp.fakessh.eu:
(host ks3.kimsufi.com[/var/run/dspam/dspam.sock] said: 421 4.3.0
fake...@localhost.ks3.kimsufi.com Deferred: 451-4.7.0 DNS timeout
(in reply to end of DATA command))
Looks like a problem within dspam
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
* Wietse Venema postfix-users@postfix.org:
OK, the 20121224 Christmas edition does this and more, and it also
produces more warnings. As for the latter I wonder if it will freak
out people and would need to be shut up at install/upgrade time.
Didn't freak me out, but instead it listed an
* Bob Cohen b...@bobjcohen.com:
Follows are several maillog entries. I'm not clear on how to read them.
warning: restriction `reject_rbl_client' after `permit' is ignored
Does this mean, Postfix rejected an email based on the
reject_rbl_client rule, which was placed in the main.cf after
I can use smtpd_command_filter to add NOTIFY=NEVER and thus suppress
bounces from my own Postfix.
But how can I remove the NOTIFY=NEVER again when sending mail (maybe
via a specific SMTP transport) to some external host?
Sounds like I'm looking for smtp_command_filter?
--
[*] sys4 AG
* Robert Schetterer r...@sys4.de:
Am 07.02.2013 14:38, schrieb Marcio Merlone:
Em 07-02-2013 11:19, Noel Jones escreveu:
Regardless of how you state the problem, it should already be clear
that postfix does not have native capability to do selective BCC based
on the subject.
Yes, it was
* deconya deco...@riseup.net:
Hi list
Im looking to activate a smarthost in my postfix, and for this I need to
use the function smtp_sasl_password_maps. I have and old server 2.5.5
and Im not sure if was supported in this old version. Where can I see
the changelogs to confirm this?
* Vince Wang vw...@nwp.org:
Hello,
We have a configured postfix email server worked well when we had it on the
public IP. After we moved it behind our firewall on a intranet with ip
192.168.xxx.xxx, we found it is very slow when we send newsletter.
Logs?
As I just start learning about
* Piotr Rotter piotr.rot...@active24.pl:
I want to disallow this because is rarely (probably poor mail
clients) and make more difficult to automatic parsing amavis logs
like this
2013-02-25T04:29:47+01:00 kurier4 amavis[20204]: (20204-10) Passed
CLEAN, - u...@domain.tld, Hits: -2.56,
I wrote a little something about how to prevent delivery to mailboxes
over quota while still being in the SMTP dialogue:
http://sys4.de/en/blog/2013/04/08/postfix-dovecot-mailbox-quota/
(Postfix/Dovecot)
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
* Ralf Hildebrandt r...@sys4.de:
I wrote a little something about how to prevent delivery to mailboxes
over quota while still being in the SMTP dialogue:
http://sys4.de/en/blog/2013/04/08/postfix-dovecot-mailbox-quota/
(Postfix/Dovecot)
To be precise: Postfix/Dovecot-2.2
--
[*] sys4 AG
* Titanus Eramius tita...@aptget.dk:
Very useful, thank you for writing and sharing. May I suggest the
english Wiki-article for background on backscatter?
URL?
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München,
* Titanus Eramius tita...@aptget.dk:
Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:27:26 +0200 skrev Ralf Hildebrandt r...@sys4.de:
* Titanus Eramius tita...@aptget.dk:
Very useful, thank you for writing and sharing. May I suggest the
english Wiki-article for background on backscatter?
URL?
Sorry
* L.W. van Braam van Vloten luc...@dds.nl:
Hello list,
I would like to to use my postfix implementation to relay mail from one
specific host on the internet, to any address on the internet. The idea is
that the external host will send name in my name, i.e. it will appear to
come from my
On our Postfix gateway we're using a policy query to our backend
dovecot server to check if the mail would fit into the mailbox.
Recently I noticed that the hu-berlin.de Mailserver keeps retrying in
spite of a 522 error:
May 1 05:32:36 mail postfix/smtpd[5185]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
* Bastian Blank bastian+postfix-users=postfix@waldi.eu.org:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:18:43AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Tue Apr 30 20:05:04 2013 Info: Delivery start DCID 4678286 MID 15335505 to
RID [0]
Tue Apr 30 20:05:06 2013 Info: Delayed: DCID 4678286 MID 15335505 to RID 0
* Viktor Dukhovni postfix-users@postfix.org:
In the interim you can use 554 5.2.2 ... which won't be misunderstood.
Yeah, I'll do that instead.
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB
* Phibee Network Operation Center n...@phibee.net:
Hi
we have installed today Postfix and we have a small problems with bounce.
All email genered by Postfix, for Mailbox Unknow sample, put a blank from:
May 3 15:01:27 smtp-1 postfix/qmgr[9482]: EDA7D281D2: from=,
size=5511, nrcpt=1
* Phibee Network Operation Center n...@phibee.net:
Hi
we have installed today Postfix and we have a small problems with bounce.
All email genered by Postfix, for Mailbox Unknow sample, put a blank from:
May 3 15:01:27 smtp-1 postfix/qmgr[9482]: EDA7D281D2: from=,
size=5511, nrcpt=1
I gave postfix-2.11-20130426-nonprod a spin and got this:
May 5 20:35:30 mail postfix/qmgr[2890]: warning: private/smtp socket:
malformed response
May 5 20:35:30 mail postfix/qmgr[2890]: warning: transport smtp failure -- see
a previous warning/fatal/panic logfile record for the problem
* Viktor Dukhovni postfix-users@postfix.org:
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 08:38:20PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
May 5 20:35:31 mail postfix/qmgr[2890]: warning: transport smtp failure --
see a previous warning/fatal/panic logfile record for the problem
description
May 5 20:35:31 mail
Anybody seen this one before?
May 8 00:30:04 albatross postfix/smtp[29327]: SSL_connect error to
mail.vex.net[98.158.139.68]:25: 0
May 8 00:30:04 albatross postfix/smtp[29327]: warning: TLS library problem:
29327:error:1408C06F:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_FINISHED:bad digest
length:s3_both.c:239:
* Viktor Dukhovni postfix-users@postfix.org:
Does this happen consistently, or intermittently?
consistently
Can you reproduce this with:
openssl s_client \
-cipher $(postconf -xh tls_export_cipher_list) \
-sslv2 \
-starttls smtp -connect mail.vex.net:25
#
* Viktor Dukhovni postfix-users@postfix.org:
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 03:54:35PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Can you reproduce this with:
openssl s_client \
-cipher $(postconf -xh tls_export_cipher_list) \
-sslv2 \
-starttls smtp -connect mail.vex.net:25
Sorry
* Jukka Salmi j+post...@salmi.ch:
Funny, I was just going to report the probably same issue...
:)
When sending several mails in succession, failure and success seem to
alternate (i.e. exactly one failed handshake, then a successful one,
then a failed one again, etc.). And not using a TLS
* Viktor Dukhovni postfix-users@postfix.org:
Any information on the server's O/S, OpenSSL and Postfix version
and whether the Postfix TLS session cache database is enabled would
be most helpful.
If I get any info about this from vex, I'll share it with you
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de,
* Viktor Dukhovni postfix-users@postfix.org:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 07:28:09PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Jukka Salmi j+post...@salmi.ch:
Funny, I was just going to report the probably same issue...
:)
When sending several mails in succession, failure and success seem
First: Thanks for answering at all. It's not commonplace nowadays to
find a contact and if one does to get an answer at all! :)
The whole thread (two people have similar issues with vex.net) can be
found here:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2013-05/thread.html#160
Odd.
If a SMTP destination is unreachable, is the smtp_fallback_relay tried
IMMEDATELY after not reaching the real destination or is the mail
being deferred and thus subject to queue_run_delay / minimal_backoff_time?
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669
Tryied to whitelist a SUN ILOM interface sending non-compliant mails
like this:
May 18 18:19:24 root1 postfix/smtpd[9998]: connect from mail1[80.XXX.XXX.XXX]
May 18 18:19:25 root1 postfix/smtpd[9998]: warning: Illegal address syntax from
mail1[80.XXX.XXX.XXX] in MAIL command:
* Viktor Dukhovni postfix-users@postfix.org:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 05:04:32PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:37:19PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
So I added resolve_numeric_domain=yes to a specific smtpd listening on
port 10026 - since I don'T want
* Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr:
mail.cospico.gr[62.38.156.203] timed out while sending end of data
-- message may be sent more than once)
Can you please advise me on what may be the cause of this problem?
I usually disable ESMTP when encountering those problems:
transport_maps:
cospico.gr
* Wietse Venema postfix-users@postfix.org:
Maybe you can automatically HOLD all his mail and then automatically
release all his mail in the evening.
I even have a script for that...
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München
Sitz der
Currently, smtp_fallback_relay is being used after the first failed
delivery.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_fallback_relay
explicitly mentions: With bulk email deliveries, it can be beneficial
to run the fallback relay MTA on the same host, so that it can reuse
the sender IP
Alternative/additional approach:
smtp_fallback_relay_threshold_time (compare to
smtp_pix_workaround_threshold_time)
How long a message must be queued before the Postfix SMTP client
passes the mail to the smtp_fallback_relay.
A threshold would work, with the default of 0 meaning
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org:
Fernando Gozalo:
Hi,
How can I deliver the messages to the mailbox of the sender instead of
the mailbox of the recipient?
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_sender_restrictions = pcre:/etc/postfix/sender_access
/etc/postfix/sender_access:
* LuKreme krem...@kreme.com:
On 31 Jul 2013, at 21:52 , Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
Looks as if you clobbered your smtp transport smtp unix ... smtp
smtp inet n - n - 1 postscreen
smtpd pass - - n - -
* Vincent McIntyre vincent.mcint...@csiro.au:
mailbox_size_limit = 512000 #5-ish Gb
...
Aug 8 14:22:17 ursa postfix/local[24324]: A88FA35028:
to=hapl...@mailserver.atnf.csiro.au, relay=local, delay=0.71,
delays=0.59/0/0/0.13, dsn=5.2.2, status=bounced (cannot update mailbox
1101 - 1200 of 1377 matches
Mail list logo