Mark Martinec:
WTF PDP?
Policy delegation protocol, I suppose.
Confirmed (I referred him to the mailing list, and have no
more information than what has already been posted).
Wietse
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 02:55:07PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Mark Martinec:
WTF PDP?
Policy delegation protocol, I suppose.
Confirmed (I referred him to the mailing list, and have no
more information than what has already been posted).
Then perhaps
Victor Duchovni:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 03:47:08PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
This thread suggests that each xforward attribute also needs to be
made available via Milter macros (in smtpd and cleanup), and via
the policy delegation protocol.
There seems to be some demand
Francis SOUYRI:
qshape incoming
T5 10 20 40 80 160 320 640
1280 1280+
TOTAL 3201 2121 937 87 11 21 23 0 0
0 0
This is typical for what happens after the qmgr is restarted (with
postfix reload or
Francis SOUYRI:
Hello Wietse,
For this day 15 times, all are postfix restarts, after parameters
changes to see what appended (activate/deactivate qmgr verbose)
or when there is too many mails in the incoming (to reduce the
smtpd from 100 to 40 in the master.cf)
TURN OFF ALL VERBOSE
Rocco Scappatura:
I can't identify the cause of impossibility to relay emails through my
Postifix mail gateway, from a Outlook express client.
Indeed, I get the problem while sending email with attachment with size
above 5-6 MB..
From mail log, I saw:
postfix/smtpd[16988]: connect
?li?s Tam?s:
Oct 24 22:09:24 ** postfix/master[27379]: warning: master_wakeup_timer_event:
service tlsmgr(private/tlsmgr): Resource temporarily unavailable
Oct 24 22:33:54 *** postfix/qmgr[741]: warning: connect to transport
maildrop: Resource temporarily unavailable
Oct 24 22:33:54 ***
Pete Fuggle:
So it seems that
smtpd_recipient_restrictions are somehow being invoked when VRFY is used?
VRFY is pretty useless by now because many sites disable it.
Postfix invokes smtpd_recipient_restrictions to make the reply
similar to that of RCPT TO (no point to have VRFY reply with 2xx
Rocco Scappatura:
Oct 29 10:27:58 av3 postfix/smtpd[16988]: connect from
unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz]
Oct 29 10:27:58 av3 postfix/smtpd[16988]: 7B98D75008D:
client=unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz]
Oct 29 10:34:25 av3 postfix/smtpd[16988]: timeout after DATA from
unknown[xxx.yyy.www.zzz]
Oct 29 10:34:25
Eddy Beliveau:
Documentation said:
/In the case that multiple *FILTER* actions fire, only the last one is
executed.
/I try without success to override previously defined FILTER
/^some-special-header/ FILTER my-filter
/^my-filter-been-there: Yes/ FILTER none
As documented, the
Jeff:
So
I tried inserting Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the
headers, but they still bounced to the script user.
As documented, use the sendmail -f option.
Return-Path: is created on OUTPUT, it is not used for INPUT.
Same deal with
inserting Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Errors-To: is
Postfix uses the standard getpwnam() system library routine to
determine if a user exists.
You should do your tests with getpwnam(), not with the
getent command.
Wietse
Ilo Lorusso:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#perl -le 'for (@ARGV) { print join(:,
getpwnam($_)) }' ipnoc
DO NOT RUN THE TEST AS ROOT.
Wietse
Rocco Scappatura:
12:31:06.808714 O client.1395 server.25: . 1931191:1932551(1360) ack
358 win 65178 (DF)
Can you show the TCP handshake (SYN/SYN+ACK/ACK) with TCP options.
Wietse
Bryan Irvine:
How long ago was that? I had the precise problem and had been told
that particular bug has been fixed. My problems were ~5 years ago.
Except that I'm never going to use it anyway because I just can't
force myself to trust it. I've used Postfix under ext3, ffs(openbsd),
Jordi Espasa Clofent:
Hi all,
My server has the next anvil(8) config:
smtpd_client_connection_rate_limit = 100
smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit = 20
It works fine, and when I test it from another SMTP (sending a mail to
30 recipients) the logs shows cleary:
Oct 30 15:55:00 mail09
Ofer Inbar:
I recently upgraded a couple of servers from postfix 2.2 to 2.5.
No configuration changes except those made by the upgrade scripts.
Now, during large mailings, the two new servers have frequent qmgr
crashes, while the ones running 2.2 do not. The problem is qmgr runs
up against
Ofer Inbar:
What I'm trying to understand is *why* it's hitting the limit.
If you wonder why 2.5 qmgr uses MORE file dscriptors than 2.2, that
has to do with small improvements so that qmgr can keep more delivery
agents busy. Each delivery agent corresponds with one qmgr socket.
My
Nikita Kipriyanov:
DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar ?:
For me XFS seemed very fast. But usually I use ext3, which is proven
to be stable enough for most situations.
I feel also that xfs if much faster than ext3 and reiserfs, especially
when it deals with metadata. In some bulk operation
Jaap Westerbeek:
Hi All,
Lately some spammer has been able to relay spam through my server.
I think they use a valid (hacked) account and then rewrite the sender
e-mail address.
I suggest that you identify the broken application or the comprimised
account (use weblogs and mail logs) and
Justin Piszcz:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Does XFS still overwrite existing files with zeros, when those
files were open for write at the time of unclean shutdown? This
I believe this was fixed in an early 2.6.2x release, cc'ing xfs mailing
list to confirm.
would
Eric Sandeen:
This
would violate a basic requirement of Postfix (don't lose data after
fsync). Postfix updates existing files all the time: it updates
queue files as it marks recipients as done, and it updates mailbox
files as it appends mail.
As long as postfix is looking after data
?li?s Tam?s:
Udv / Greetings!
it is already set to 30 with
default_process_limit = 30
I constantly get the errors:
Oct 31 16:25:20 *** postfix/qmgr[7260]: warning: connect to transport
maildrop: Resource temporarily unavailable
Oct 31 16:25:20 *** postfix/qmgr[7260]: warning:
Dave Chinner:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:37:58AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Eric Sandeen:
This
would violate a basic requirement of Postfix (don't lose data after
fsync). Postfix updates existing files all the time: it updates
queue files as it marks recipients as done
Vintinner, M. Scott:
One of our very important clients (a major bank), is having ongoing
problems with denial-of-service style dictionary SPAM attacks. Their
anti-spam/firewall teams are slow to respond to these outbreaks, so
there may be periods of several hours where we will get frequent
?li?s Tam?s:
Udv / Greetings!
About the limits:
ulimit -a
core file size (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
Etc.
I have news for you. Computers do not have unlimited supplies of
memory, sockets, files, etc.
Wietse
Byung-Hee HWANG:
(first of all, sorry if it is already discussed and a known issue)
Is that possible to set up Postfix with ezmlm? I'm considering to make a
private mailing list with ezmlm. Yep, i think ezmlm is more fast than
mailman. Can you please help me for that? Or some hint also
Jim Balo:
I tried this, but did not get it to work. Here is what I added to
/etc/postfix/transport:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2525
My test mail wound up locally - not recirected. Maybe I have something
backwards.
If something does not work as expected, this mailing
M.:
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 19:32 +0100, mouss wrote:
and the problem is? If they control the domain, then you have no problem!
OK, I will try to explain that by example:
0. user buys domain mydomain.com
1. user adds mx record mailserver.com to his domain
2. user adds (by perl script)
M.:
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 15:26 -0500, Jorey Bump wrote:
Although checking the MX record before provisioning would provide the
ultimate verification, it would expose the domain to the possibility of
lost mail, since it requires the customer to change the MX before the
destination is ready
I think I have solved the mystery. But I can offer you only a
workaround, to turn off selective ACK support.
Here is one event in a tcpdump file that I received a few hours
ago (full context is below the signature):
10:49:57.930285 80.74.176.142.25 217.11.85.59.2528: . ack
1998901
Rocco Scappatura:
I think I have solved the mystery. But I can offer you only a
workaround, to turn off selective ACK support.
Here is one event in a tcpdump file that I received a few hours
ago (full context is below the signature):
10:49:57.930285 80.74.176.142.25
Rocco Scappatura:
I think I have solved the mystery. But I can offer you only a
workaround, to turn off selective ACK support.
Here is one event in a tcpdump file that I received a few hours
ago (full context is below the signature):
10:49:57.930285 80.74.176.142.25
Bailo, John:
I set up postfix with the dkim-milter.
It works great when I am logged into the linux server and send
mail with the mail command.
However, if I try to connect to postfix from a remote computer,
and send mail using a client such as outlook, the DKIM-Signature
is not being
?li?s Tam?s:
Udv / Greetings!
I did not have sysctl compiled in the kernel. that one caused the
problem. (the old .config become incmpatible with the new one and I
havent chacked is all options are in place)
I don't know what the affect of sysctl to postfix, but definately has.
The effect
Reinaldo de Carvalho:
Which tcpdump version is this? Where are the time stamps and the
packets with data (Len0)?
tcpdump show only initial packet data by default and -s0 show all
data. Is usefull when decode HEX (-xX) or ASCII (-A)
I repeat, there is no need to look at the data itself.
Rocco Scappatura:
Rocco Scappatura:
12:31:06.808714 O client.1395 server.25: . 1931191:1932551(1360)
ack
358 win 65178 (DF)
Can you show the TCP handshake (SYN/SYN+ACK/ACK) with TCP options.
You are right, there is no TCP option. I will try to dump another SMTP
session.
Wietse Venema:
I don't know if this is a problem with Windows TCP/IP, or if this
is a problem with a firewall on the client side. Reportedly, some
firewalls randomize TCP sequence numbers but don't update the
sequence numbers in SACK fields. That would be a sure way to mess
up TCP.
Quoting
2. I (my guests) am sending many newsletters with my postfix. Can
I set the sending rate? ( Like: 10 mail/second )
This will limit the rate when you send all your mail through the
same ISP mailhost. It is available in Postfix 2.5 and later.
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtp_destination_rate_delay
Matheus Lima:
Recently, withou any changing in my configurations, the e-mail send to any
gmail accounts are getting deferred:
Nov 5 18:00:38 tampa postfix/smtp[5687]: 88D6A48F2: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[72.14.205.27]:25, delay=2189,
delays=2186/0.01/2.6/0.54,
Ralf Hildebrandt:
Exemple :
smtp unix- - n - 100 smtp
-o myhostname=server1
way1 unix- - n - 100 smtp
-o myhostname=server2
way2 unix- - n - 100 smtp
Wietse Venema:
Ralf Hildebrandt:
Exemple :
smtp unix- - n - 100 smtp
-o myhostname=server1
way1 unix- - n - 100 smtp
-o myhostname=server2
way2 unix- - n
Nikita Kipriyanov:
Michael Moritz ?:
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 14:41:42 mouss wrote:
Thanks. Any idea how to populate /etc/postfix/relay_recipients with all
valid usernames?
rsync, mysql, postgres, ldap, ... etc.
Thanks but I have quite a number of
Michael Moritz ?:
since I use a recipients cache file that will grow and need maintaining. (The
third problem would be having to delete (?) the cache every time users,
aliases, sql, etc are altered on the mail/smtp machine). Could postfix offer
some sort of verify this address service /
Victor Duchovni:
When a message-id is followed by rfc822 comment text:
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (test)
2008-11-06T13:13:35-0500 amnesiac postfix/cleanup[10832]: AF24675A3D:
message-id=[EMAIL PROTECTED] (test)
postfix logs both the id and the comment. This is
Robert Fitzpatrick:
I have double-bounce messages in the queue, not sure what that is all
about. For instance, to Yahoo addresses. Is this related to the fact
that I am doing AV to those addresses?
If the message has status=deliverable or status=undeliverable,
then the message is an address
Byung-Hee HWANG:
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
[...]
It is added by the mail client, not the server.
Can you please show me some example?
RFC2822 section 3.6.2 has one example.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-3.6.2
Mailing lists (including this one) also provide a Sender:
Michael Moritz:
This is a problem we came upon while setting up the split MX (described
earlier on this list). On the the smtp gateway I have this in master.cf
smtp inet n - - - 20 smtpd
-o cleanup_service_name=pre-cleanup
-o
Noel Jones:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Iker Perez de Albeniz:
In my main.cf for example i have added:
smtps_data_restrictions = check_client_acces pcre:/etc/postfix/access.pcre
It is not called smtps_data_restrictions.
and in that example access file i have putted
Postfix hash_queue_names uses one-character (letter or digit)
directory names. This is sufficient to implement a tree.
Current queue file names are longer than 1, because they have two
parts (inode number and time).
A future queue implementation may use a different organization:
one tree that
Victor Duchovni:
On the other hand, for well-formed headers, the
comment is not part of the message-id: for example:
2008-11-06T01:11:19-0500 amnesiac postfix/cleanup[13756]: AE620EF8001:
message-id=[EMAIL PROTECTED] (added by [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Should Postfix
Ofer Inbar:
Postfix hash_queue_names uses one-character (letter or digit)
directory names. This is sufficient to implement a tree.
Current queue file names are longer than 1, because they have two
parts (inode number and time).
Thanks!
A future queue implementation may use a
Victor Duchovni:
How would one decide that a (message-id) header is not mangled?
This would require parsing the string, counting the address
tokens, and if there is only one address token, use that as the
logged message ID, otherwise log the entire original string.
Real-life
Ville Walveranta:
Many thanks! That should get me going.
If I disable the default in master.cf, does
the first interface-specific smtpd become smtpd without a suffix or
does it remain enumerated since it's not generic? I'll find that out
Postfix uses the names that YOU specify. It does not
Ville Walveranta:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Postfix uses the names that YOU specify. It does not
magically rename things.
From the MASTER(5):
The service name is specified as host:port
Test:
All,
I have a problem with my setup of postfix/web-cyradm...
I am running 3 domains locally and 3 domains i only relay to another
location.
When an incoming mail contains a name before the @ sign which i have as
a local user but also a user in the relayed domain exists, the mail
Test:
Strange thing:
I have a defined a few domains in /etc/postfix/transport:
relaydomain.com smtp:[relaydomain.com]:65525
.relaydomain.com smtp:[relaydomain.com]:65525
Mail to relaydomain.com is relayed OK...
But if have not specified anything in the /etc/postfix/relay_domains
Alexander Gr?ner:
Hi,
is there a possibilty for an exception for the parameter
smtpd_hard_error_limit like there is one for
smtpd_client_event_limit_exceptions ?
We have a quite funny Lotus server running here which seems to have
problems when running into this limit.
I did not
Nikita Kipriyanov:
Hello.
For a local aliasing, it is possible to specify the command as a
destination for mail, using 'pipe' character. We're using this
possibility to bind spam-learning facility, like this:
(main.cf)
alias_maps = /etc/aliases
(/etc/aliases)
spam:
Roderick A. Anderson:
I'm starting to get a lot of SPAM where the Sender matches the To:.
You mean, the From: and To: headers, or the MAIL FROM and the RCPT
TO address in SMTP commands?
Note that From: and To: headers can be completely different from
the MAIL FROM and the RCPT TO address in
Watashi:
Hello all,
I have a trouble with my two mail servers where the users's maildir are. I use
Courier Authdaemon with PAM_LDAP authenticating against a M$ Active Directory
to serve imap, pop3 and maildrop. More than 8.000 accounts. The MTA is Postfix
looking up for users in M$ AD
Lars Ebeling:
warning: process /usr/libexec/postfix/smtp pid 17858 killed by signal 11
Wietse:
To debug by hand, try:
# gdb /usr/libexec/postfix/smtp -S
# gdb /usr/libexec/postfix/smtp -u -S
Lars Ebeling:
# /opt/csw/bin/gdb /usr/libexec/postfix/smtp -S
/opt/csw/bin/gdb:
Watashi:
What is the error message?
The error is those messages on console about no memory from kernel ( a lot
of
process dumps on screen). All applications stops to work and I have to
ctrl +
atl + prt src + s + b to reboot the servers.
I will not ask the same question again.
Jaap Westerbeek:
Received: from User (unknown [64.129.70.219])
by mail01.cq-link.sr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AFD5F4526;
Fri, 7 Nov 2008 18:55:47 -0300 (SRT)
There's your spammer.
Wietse
Kevin P. Knox:
My Postfix server is running 2.2.10, so I don't think I can use CIDRs, but
can possibly list the internal servers as 32 bit addresses?
CDIR table lookups were introduced with Postfix 2.1.
Wietse
What is the output of:
grep 6F38E5F4595 /the/maillog/file
grep D8AFD5F4526 /the/maillog/file
One is before Amavis, one is after Amavis.
Wietse
Jaap Westerbeek:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated,
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/access_recipient,
There is your open relay. Put it below
reject_unauth_destination,
Wietse
Octavio:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
Hi
my server have some public IPs and I want to use one that is not
the primary (eth0:0) but when I send email always use the one in
eth0 despite the postfix is have as interface just the one in
eth0:0 and lo
See:
Stefan Palme:
Hi all,
I have something like this in my main.cf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_non_fqdn_sender,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
permit_mynetworks,
Roderick A. Anderson:
I'm implementing greylisting on CentOS 5 systems.
These are spools for the actual mailserver/mailbox systems.
Currently we have:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_unauth_pipelining,cheap
reject_non_fqdn_sender, cheap
M?rcio Luciano Donada:
Hi list,
I am successfully using the parameters, but the e-mails arriving at
their destination duplicates, is that correct? I'm using postfix 2.3.8-2
See: http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html and look for
receive_override_options.
Wietse
Res:
Hi All,
Is there a way to insert line breaks in the banner? On Sendmail we
use \n, which does not work on Postfix.
Postfix smtpd_banner behaves as documented.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_banner
Wietse
Res:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Is there a way to insert line breaks in the banner? On Sendmail we
use \n, which does not work on Postfix.
Postfix smtpd_banner behaves as documented.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_banner
Already read and an hour'd
Rajkumar S:
Hi,
I get this error when I tried to send a mail via postdrop.
vhs3:~# cat signedmail.txt | postdrop
queue_id4BAE870402Fpostdrop: fatal: uid=0: unexpected record type: 68
The postdrop command behaves as documented.
http://www.postfix.org/postdrop.1.html
In particular, see
Rajkumar S:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rajkumar S:
Hi,
I get this error when I tried to send a mail via postdrop.
vhs3:~# cat signedmail.txt | postdrop
queue_id4BAE870402Fpostdrop: fatal: uid=0: unexpected record type: 68
Durk Strooisma:
Hi all,
I was examining my Postfix logs and saw two sequential sessions using the
same queue ID. I was a bit surprised as I had the assumption that queue IDs
were generated randomly, which means they should be practically unique.
Postfix behaves as documented. Please point
Jacky Chan:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
If your prorblem is output-rate or destination concurrency, you are using
the wrong tool.
As subject, yeap, I actually want to setup such kind of transport to avoid
getting greylist from yahoo.
As I know, Postfix 2.5 has
Durk Strooisma:
I was examining my Postfix logs and saw two sequential sessions using
the same queue ID. I was a bit surprised as I had the assumption that
queue IDs were generated randomly, which means they should be
practically unique.
Postfix behaves as documented. Please point out
of an email its authoritative tracking.
Just curious. Thanks,
Olivier
- Original Message -
From: Wietse Venema [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: Queue ID gets reused? Not unique?
Durk
James Grant:
Is the smtp service chroot'ed? Doing so is a real exorcise in getting it
to work.
gah that was exactly it! a chroot wont follow symlinks out of the chroot
will it? I disabled the chroot in master.cf and it works fine. I think for
now im just going to run smtpd without
Charles Marcus:
On 11/14/2008, Wietse Venema ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Postfix as released by me does not chroot anything. Some
Linux distributors insist on setting up things this way,
which only can give Postfix a bad reputation.
Perhaps if enough people complain it will be changed
Victor Duchovni:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 09:14:07AM +1100, Petr Janda wrote:
Hi all,
I have got reports about lost mail(not received, im the receiver not the
sender) recently and trying to find out whats going on seems to be beyond
me.
Basically a lot of email is lost with timeout
Petr Janda:
Something is badly screwing up TCP, perhaps by throwing away packets
with flags that it does not like.
A misconfigured firewall? Seems unlikely as this timeout problem
really happens a lot. Im also going to have a look at the Cisco ADSL
router, maybe try replacing it with
Jason Wohlford:
Is there any way to perform an address verification on a message and
then add a header to the message? I'd like to let postfix do address
verification and then report the result to spamassassin. Suggestions?
By design, address verification messages are never delivered.
Paul Hutchings:
Is it possible (for a novice who knows nothing about source code mods)
to customize the bounce generated by a message that is larger than the
size accepted under message_size_limit please?
No. In fact, if the message is rejected during the inbound SMTP
session, the NDR is sent
Listas:
Hello,
I wonder if it is possible to specify the informative text for bounce
messages, depending on the exit code from pipe(8).
Something like having this in master.cf:
mycmdunix - n n - 10 pipe
bounce_message_map=/path/to/pipemap flags=... user=...
Petr Janda:
If there is a traffic shaper at your end, it may replace your
TCP stack's MSS=1460 announcement by something smaller, like 890.
Could this also be caused by the ISP?
Something is throwing away the first 7300 bytes of the email message.
Depending on how pervasive this behavior
Wietse Venema:
Petr Janda:
If there is a traffic shaper at your end, it may replace your
TCP stack's MSS=1460 announcement by something smaller, like 890.
Could this also be caused by the ISP?
Something is throwing away the first 7300 bytes of the email message.
Depending on how
Petr Janda:
Can you verify that your machine really announces a MSS of 1460?
Actually you caught me while tempering with the MTU, Ive had it set to
800 for testing and some of the lost mail started getting through, but
with a setting this low IMAP authentication stopped working
altogether.
Barney Desmond:
* Noone's pointed out the your first packet capture also exhibits the
same missing data problem. After the client sends RCPT TO and you
respond with an Ok, the next thing it drops on the wire is Received:
from srv1.shoppingsquare.com.au in frame 12. I'm not that confident in
Petr Janda:
by the way postmaster@ wont work. we dont set them up as the email
addresses are stored in ldap and its just a hassle to create an extra
postmaster@ address for each domain we host. if you want maybe try
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You must provide a postmaster address,as required by
I have made a test adding the following code in mimedefang-filter:
sub filter_sender {
my ($sender, $ip, $hostname, $helo) = @_;
if ($sender =~ /sosogh.cn/i) {
return (FILTER smtp:[202.96.15.55]:25,);
}
return ('CONTINUE', ok);
}
But the log said 554 5.7.1
Diego Castillo:
Hi all,
I would like to force my Postfix SMTP server to disconnect from time to
time, in order to prevent its clients from reusing the same connection for
too long or for too many transactions.
After reading through the documentation and searching the archives of this
: Force SMTP server disconnect
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:07:44AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
I don't want to force a retry at the client side, I want to force
the client to stop reusing the connection and open a new one from
time to time. Ideally after a max number of messages
Diego Castillo:
I think anvil is a poor fit for the problem description.
Anvil monitors plant-wide rates, and may trigger client
backoff, while the OP wants a single connection re-use
limit, which does not require an external counting process,
each SMTP server alrwady has all the data it
As documented, smtp_header_checks etc. cannot change the destination.
Destination changes would not make sense, because the checks happen
while mail is being delivered.
Wietse
Wietse:
As documented, smtp_header_checks etc. cannot change the destination.
Destination changes would not make sense, because the checks happen
while mail is being delivered.
Charles Account:
If I create a second relay-smtp queue that is configured to be a
relay to deliver mail to my
To redirect one without changing the recipient address:
/etc/postfix main.cf:
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
/etc/postfix/transport:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp:mx.b.example.com
Many years ago I tried to unify virtual aliasing and transport
mapping into one table, but I gave
Please see FILTER_README and search for receive_override_options.
Wieste
Xueron Nee:
Hi,
I'm using `always_bcc` to backup all my messages to a monitor user, and it
works fine.
My problems is: if a message was sent to more than one recipients, the
message will
bcc to the monitor user several copies.
I just hope to backup every messages only once, is
1701 - 1800 of 13245 matches
Mail list logo
