I should correct myself: I meant to say that if I point directly to the
image, postgis doesn't see it.
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 at 08:30, andy wrote:
> Good morning,
> I still couldn't read the tif. As written before postgis can read the
> folder, and it sees the image inside.
> But if I point direct
Good morning,
I still couldn't read the tif. As written before postgis can read the
folder, and it sees the image inside.
But if I point directly to the folder, it doesn't see it.
What am I doing wrong?
Sorry to write again, but I am stuck.
Thank you
--
___
Andrea Borruso
webs
Yah the data directory is less likely to have screwed up permissions that the
postgres account can’t access. So I would go with Jorge’s idea.
That said I would think that having permission with r r r should do the trick
and the fact you can get a directory listing suggests the postgres proc
Hi Andrea,
I always put the raster somewhere below Postgresql data_directory.
psql
show data_directory;
I hope it helps.
Saluti,
Jorge
On 04/12/23 22:23, andy via postgis-users wrote:
Hi,
if I run "SELECT (ST_BandMetaData(rast)).* FROM rasters_outdb LIMIT
1;", in the field path I have "/di
