Please feel free to provide your management with the technical design document
for the SDI in the Netherlands.
http://www.geonovum.nl/sites/default/files/MOT_20100618_TechnicalDesign_v1.01.pdf
The document is in English, so you don't have to brush off your Dutch language
skills. Also read
Ravi wrote:
Some so called SDI experts feel that FOSS SDI cannot perform at-par with
Proprietary SDI.
Please provide examples to fight a case from an Indian state which
swears by Free and Open Source Software. We can never expect a better
level playing field.
Kerala - India
Here are some
Gee, somebody is desperate.
S
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:07:55 +1000, Mark Cave-Ayland
mark.cave-ayl...@siriusit.co.uk wrote:
Ravi wrote:
Some so called SDI experts feel that FOSS SDI cannot perform at-par with
Proprietary SDI.
Please provide examples to fight a case from an Indian state which
Hi all,
one thing you may want to point out to the Indian Authorities is also that
the phrase A highly scalable system may therefore be confronted with high
license costs should be be understood according to what geoinformation is.
A large system has a large number of potential external users,
For what it's worth: I cannot speak about FOSS in general, but for
raster servers I dare to take position.
Open-source rasdaman repeatedly has been reported to have a performance
way superior to ArcSDE.
Some more voices (look at the Oracle one!):
“world leading technology. -- Aerovista France
Hola estoy contruyendo los sentidos en un tabla que almacena las vias
de la zona centrica de una ciudad, los sentidos son simples, solo
quiero saber como puedo modelar los cruces y los sentidos.
he visto que en arcgis utilizan un par de columnas FROMLEFT, TOLEFT,
FROMRIGHT, TORIGHT.
Gracias.
Hi all,
The documentation for ST_Distance_Spheroid (
http://postgis.refractions.net/docs/ST_Distance_Spheroid.html ) states
that it does not look at the SRID of a geometry and will always
assume its in WGS 80 long lat.
What is WGS 80? Is it WGS-84, GRS-80, or something else entirely?
Cheers,
