So Emilie and Kevin, what do you think of the results and the new solution I
came up with ? Any improvements you would make or comments on why other
approaches will not scale as well ?
Sébastien
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 15:54, Sébastien Lorion
wrote:
> Happy New Year everyone!
>
> I got time to te
Aren,
You might have more luck on the R-sig-geo list. This looks like a mix of
network analysis and point processes -
check out pgRouting, or look for routing algorithms
check out the sp package and then spatstat, network etc.
An approach (by no means the right or even a good one) is to think
I have three datasets:
1. Routes
2. Event type A that occurs along the routes (points)
3. Event type B that occurs along the routes (points)
Both event types have several attributes, including a date/timestamp,
sub-classes of each event type, and other meaningful attributes.
I'm trying
Just want to confirm that it was 3082. Reprojecting from 3082 to 3081 makes
it mes well with within my existing data. Thank you so much!
Aren
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Aren Cambre wrote:
> Ben and Paul,
>
> Thank you!
>
> I didn't know about http://prj2epsg.org. Nice site.
>
> I was aware
Ben and Paul,
Thank you!
I didn't know about http://prj2epsg.org. Nice site.
I was aware of http://spatialreference.org/, but in retrospect I was trying
to find an exact match of the entire WKT using that site's search engine and
Google. Thanks for the tip about searching on shorter parts. Yeah,
