For what it's worth: I cannot speak about FOSS in general, but for
raster servers I dare to take position.
Open-source rasdaman repeatedly has been reported to have a performance
way superior to ArcSDE.
Some more voices (look at the Oracle one!):
“world leading technology." -- Aerovista France (
Hi all,
one thing you may want to point out to the Indian Authorities is also that
the phrase "A highly scalable system may therefore be confronted with high
license costs" should be be understood according to what geoinformation is.
A large system has a large number of potential external users, m
Gee, somebody is desperate.
S
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:07:55 +1000, Mark Cave-Ayland
wrote:
Ravi wrote:
Some so called SDI experts feel that FOSS SDI cannot perform at-par with
Proprietary SDI.
Please provide examples to fight a case from an Indian state which
swears by Free and Open Source So
Ravi wrote:
Some so called SDI experts feel that FOSS SDI cannot perform at-par with
Proprietary SDI.
Please provide examples to fight a case from an Indian state which
swears by Free and Open Source Software. We can never expect a better
level playing field.
Kerala - India
Here are some ex
ctions.net
Subject: [postgis-users] Help in Defending FOSS SDI
Some so called SDI experts feel that FOSS SDI cannot perform at-par with
Proprietary SDI.
Please
provide examples to fight a case from an Indian state which swears by
Free and Open Source Software. We can never expect a better level
pla
Some so called SDI experts feel that FOSS SDI cannot perform at-par with
Proprietary SDI.
Please
provide examples to fight a case from an Indian state which swears by
Free and Open Source Software. We can never expect a better level
playing field.
Kerala - India
Here are some excerpts from a
