Re: [postgis-users] pgsql2shp revision

2010-09-13 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
strk wrote: Perhaps we could "touch" the pgsql2shp-core.h file but that just seems messy :( Why drop the feature ? If we want a "true" repository revision we should provide that in an header file (which we'd touch) and use that when we see fit. I wouldn't drop the file-specific one though, you

Re: [postgis-users] pgsql2shp revision

2010-09-12 Thread strk
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 02:31:52PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > This appears to be a "feature" of SVN in that the revision number > embedded in the file is the last revision that altered that particular > file, and not the latest revision of the whole repository. Since we > store the revisi

Re: [postgis-users] pgsql2shp revision

2010-09-10 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
Denis Rykov wrote: Is the pgsl2shp show correct SVN version of revision? After updated pgsql2shp from svn and start pgsql2shp without options I get: RCSID: $Id: pgsql2shp-core.h 5870 2010-08-28 09:16:32Z mcayland $ RELEASE: 2.0 USE_GEOS=1 USE_PROJ=1 USE_STATS=1 But last SVN revision n

[postgis-users] pgsql2shp revision

2010-09-07 Thread Denis Rykov
Is the pgsl2shp show correct SVN version of revision? After updated pgsql2shp from svn and start pgsql2shp without options I get: RCSID: $Id: pgsql2shp-core.h 5870 2010-08-28 09:16:32Z mcayland $ RELEASE: > 2.0 USE_GEOS=1 USE_PROJ=1 USE_STATS=1 But last SVN revision number is not 5870. _