Re: [Pound Mailing List] user IP

On 02/19/2012 08:29 PM, Bashar wrote:Being not a Zope expert this could be a hard task to me ... > I'm upgrading now, but there is no feature in pound that would make the > original IP forwards to zope? > > Thanks Apparently the method for this is similar to many other systems - same problem,

Re: [Pound Mailing List] too many open files please help

On 12/30/2010 03:34 PM, Emilio Campos wrote: > Hi, Piotr, Now I am running pound with user root: > > r...@mymachine# /opt/pound-2.5/sbin/pound -f /opt/pound-2.5/etc/pound.conf > > r...@mymachine# ps -ef | grep pound > root 11864 1 0 08:59 ?00:00:00 /opt/pound-2.5/sbin/pound -f > /o

Re: [Pound Mailing List] pound errors libgcc_s.sl

On 09/01/2010 07:26 PM, Anne Moore wrote: I do have the libgcc installed /lib/libgcc._s.so.1. This is kicking me in the butt... Thanks -Original Message Joe hit the nail on the head Anne. Sounds like you're missing the libgcc RPM. On my RHEL 4 box, it's libgcc-3.4.5-2. If you have yu

Re: [Pound Mailing List] TLS named virtual hosts and Pound

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:46:46PM -0400, Dave Steinberg wrote: > Matti Aarnio wrote: > >The Pound proxy web page says that "one can not do named virtual hosts > >on HTTPS, because the protocol does not support it". This used to > >be true, but necessary specific

[Pound Mailing List] TLS named virtual hosts and Pound

d of server clusters. If the session-cache does not respond within about 0.1 seconds, wait time approaches that of new DH handshake, and should be abandoned in favour of doing actual handshake, and then pushing the new data to session cache. Best Regards, Matti Aarnio, Helsinki -- To unsubscrib