Re: [Pound Mailing List] ANNOUNCE: Pound - reverse proxy and load balancer - v2.5c

2009-11-01 Thread Albert
We're still seeing this problem. I did a quick diff between 2.4.5 and 2.5c, and only had a question about the new check on line 134 inside get_line function (in the new code): if(buf[i] == '\0') { n_read = i; continue; } What is it suppose to achieve? Why put "continue", as this is th

Re: [Pound Mailing List] ANNOUNCE: Pound - reverse proxy and load balancer - v2.5c

2009-10-29 Thread Dave Steinberg
Robert Segall wrote: This is to announce the release of Pound v2.5c. This is an experimental version - the third in the 2.5 series (and incidentally also the first release candidate for 2.5). Changes since version 2.5b: Enhancements: - added support for HTTPS backends (with or without a client

Re: [Pound Mailing List] ANNOUNCE: Pound - reverse proxy and load balancer - v2.5c

2009-10-29 Thread Albert
We switched to the new version on Monday on production servers. Everything has been running fine (including ConnTO and IgnoreCase directives. I've also used HTTPS directive in our test environment, and it works). Today, however, pound was taking 100% of the CPU on both of the production serv

Re: [Pound Mailing List] ANNOUNCE: Pound - reverse proxy and load balancer - v2.5c

2009-10-19 Thread Dave Steinberg
Robert Segall wrote: This is to announce the release of Pound v2.5c. This is an experimental version - the third in the 2.5 series (and incidentally also the first release candidate for 2.5). Changes since version 2.5b: Enhancements: - added support for HTTPS backends (with or without a client

[Pound Mailing List] ANNOUNCE: Pound - reverse proxy and load balancer - v2.5c

2009-09-21 Thread Robert Segall
This is to announce the release of Pound v2.5c. This is an experimental version - the third in the 2.5 series (and incidentally also the first release candidate for 2.5). Changes since version 2.5b: Enhancements: - added support for HTTPS backends (with or without a client certificate. No ba