on 6/4/03 1:17 AM, Eric L. Strobel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Perhaps with provision for allowing such folks to "serve out their
> sentences" and be released on "parole"...
Absolutely -- maybe even time off for good behavior.
Best,
Victoria
--
Let's take back our country in 2004: Howard Dea
somewhere near the temporal coordinates of 6/3/03 6:32 PM, the entity known
as victoria brandon transmitted the following from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> It sounds like the limitations proposed will be flexible enough to fit the
> eventualities, but the kind of arrangement I had vaguely in mind was not
In response to my suggestion that
>> Could things be set up so that postings over a certain number *might* (at
>> the option of a listnanny, say) be cut off, rather than having it happen
>> automatically? Thus providing a big stick to wave at malefactors if needed
>> without interfering with norm
