Re: Problem when fetching message using IMAP

Jan Litzinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, folks! I have a problem with IMAP. I get this error message Error when fetching message. And then the Subject followed by this (({9} PM freezes and I have to force quit. Could someone help? Hi Kjell, try to clean the cache. This works in

RE: Problem when fetching message using IMAP

Ewan Chilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You have IMAP working for powermail? How?!?!?! Tell me NOW! Please please please *beg* Yes, it works, why shouldn't it? What's your problem? ;-) -- Regards, Kjell Olausson http://www.kio.nu Alingsås, Sweden Umax Apus 2000|166MHz|OS 9.1|80MB/81MB WM

Re: Problem when fetching message using IMAP

Kjell Olausson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, folks! I have a problem with IMAP. I get this error message Error when fetching message. And then the Subject followed by this (({9} PM freezes and I have to force quit. Could someone help? I just tested with PM 4.1.3 and the same thing

Re: Problem when fetching message using IMAP

Hi, folks! I have a problem with IMAP. I get this error message Error when fetching message. And then the Subject followed by this (({9} PM freezes and I have to force quit. Could someone help? Hi Kjell, try to clean the cache. This works in the following way: - Setup / Mail accounts - Go

RE: Problem when fetching message using IMAP

You have IMAP working for powermail? How?!?!?! Tell me NOW! Please please please *beg* Ewan Chilton Web Application Developer Griffin Internet -Original Message- From: Kjell Olausson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 6:32 PM To: PowerMail discussions Subject:

Problem when fetching message using IMAP

Hi, folks! I have a problem with IMAP. I get this error message Error when fetching message. And then the Subject followed by this (({9} PM freezes and I have to force quit. Could someone help? -- Regards, Kjell Olausson http://www.kio.nu Alingsås, Sweden Umax Apus 2000|166MHz|OS

Re: truncated reply address (?)

I think the point is, we (especially me) make a big deal about how mail should follow the RFCs. Ah. Well this makes sense then. Thanks for explaining. ---marlyse

Re: truncated reply address (?)

Marlyse Comte [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday, July 29, 2003 stated: I did some more testing and it appears that powermail will not send an email that has more then 80 (as far as I can tell) characters in the To: field Why would you want more than 80 chars in the first place? I think the point

Re: truncated reply address (?)

Hi Greg, I did some more testing and it appears that powermail will not send an email that has more then 80 (as far as I can tell) characters in the To: field I'm not seeing this. My domain is set up with a 'catchall' so [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be routed to me. I just sent an email to:

Re: truncated reply address (?)

I did some more testing and it appears that powermail will not send an email that has more then 80 (as far as I can tell) characters in the To: field Why would you want more than 80 chars in the first place? ---marlyse

Re: truncated reply address (?)

Basically I think it not a good system, even if it sounds in theory good. Especially bad if you are subscribed to a list, as EACH list member responding to the LIST will get such a stupid message (happened to me from somebody who had it installed). No way will I respond to somebodies message

Re: truncated reply address (?)

Hello, I did some more testing and it appears that powermail will not send an email that has more then 80 (as far as I can tell) characters in the To: field (for example: 'net-virtual.com-gsaylor2-qconfirm- [EMAIL PROTECTED]' is 96 characters and if I change it to 'rtual.com-gsaylor2-qconfirm-

truncated reply address (?)

Hello, I am trying to install qcontrol on my mail server (finally totally fed up with the level of junk email)... The tool I am trying to use is qcontrol (for qmail servers), but that's not really important... What is important is how it works, basically, it's a system which requires that