>>Not e-mail addresses (those were certain to be removed),
>
>No, email addresses in body was not certain to be removed and are not in
>the current online archive.
I was assuming Dave Nathanson's archive suggestion which would:
>The mail archiver I'm talking about obscures all email addresses, e
Mikael Byström said:
>If the search window said "among the visible windows"
Obviously I meant "among the visible *messages*"
PM 5.2.1 | OS X 10.3.9 | Powerbook G4/400 | 768MB RAM | 30GB HD
C. A. Niemiec said:
>Not e-mail addresses (those were certain to be removed),
No, email addresses in body was not certain to be removed and are not in
the current online archive.
PM 5.2.1 | OS X 10.3.9 | Powerbook G4/400 | 768MB RAM | 30GB HD
Mikael Byström ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2005-10-07 21:42 said:
>>I'm afraid I can't agree... the list is public, isn't it? And public
>>means, well, public. :)
>
>Since when does "public" mean "let's leave out everyones email addresses
>out for the spambots"? Wooly thinking.
Sorry I wasn't cleare
>>I'm afraid I can't agree... the list is public, isn't it? And public
>>means, well, public. :)
>
>Since when does "public" mean "let's leave out everyones email addresses
>out for the spambots"? Wooly thinking.
Not e-mail addresses (those were certain to be removed), but that one's
name appear
Sean McBride said:
>I'm afraid I can't agree... the list is public, isn't it? And public
>means, well, public. :)
Since when does "public" mean "let's leave out everyones email addresses
out for the spambots"? Wooly thinking.
PM 5.2.1 | OS X 10.3.9 | Powerbook G4/400 | 768MB RAM | 30GB HD
cheshirekat said:
>I feel the exact opposite - when I want to search ALL messages in a
>folder, then I make sure all messages are being viewed
But the viewing as of the messages window and as of how the search
window limit searches are two different interfaces and are not
automatically thought
Thanks Barbara. I didn't realize that.
--
Andy Fragen
On Thu, Oct 6, 2005, Barbara Needham said:
>Andy Fragen on 10/6/05 said
>
>>One of the reasons I love PM is it's "View Unread" command. A problem
>>I've discovered is that if the 'View Unread' is selected for a folder a
>>search will not se
Barbara Needham on 10/6/05 said
>Andy Fragen on 10/6/05 said
>
>>One of the reasons I love PM is it's "View Unread" command. A problem
>>I've discovered is that if the 'View Unread' is selected for a folder a
>>search will not search unread items. A Spotlight search will show the
>>message but se
Andy Fragen on 10/6/05 said
>One of the reasons I love PM is it's "View Unread" command. A problem
>I've discovered is that if the 'View Unread' is selected for a folder a
>search will not search unread items. A Spotlight search will show the
>message but selecting it in Spotlight will not cause
A-NO-NE Music ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2005-10-05 10:35 said:
>>* Is there any reason NOT to publicly archive this discussion list?
>
>I do not wish my name is googled through this list, not to mention you
>can google my email address through this list (and one other) right now.
>
>I don't know ab
On Thu, Oct 6, 200511:26 AM, the following words from Andy Fragen
[EMAIL PROTECTED], emerged from a plethora of SPAM ...
>One of the reasons I love PM is it's "View Unread" command. A problem
>I've discovered is that if the 'View Unread' is selected for a folder a
>search will not search unread i
Jeremy Hughes said:
>Note: "Re: Wibble" may be a reply to "Fwd: Wibble". Some email clients
>strip "Fwd:" from email titles before adding "Re:"
>
>This would make it easier to view and follow threads.
I just strip superfluous "Re:" "Fwd:" and others with an adapted version
of Andy Fragens "Clean
One of the reasons I love PM is it's "View Unread" command. A problem
I've discovered is that if the 'View Unread' is selected for a folder a
search will not search unread items. A Spotlight search will show the
message but selecting it in Spotlight will not cause the message to
show, because it's
On Thu, Oct 6, 2005 at 5:33 pm -0500, Wayne Brissette wrote:
>This will do what you want...
Brilliant! Many thanks Wayne - yet again!
TimH
--
PowerMail 5.2.1 | OS X 10.4.2 | PowerBook FW/500 | 640MB RAM
This will do what you want...
-- Begin AppleScript
tell application "PowerMail"
set MySig to the signature of text signature "Sig1"
(* You'll want to replace "Sig1" with the NAME of your Signature *)
set MyMessages to current messages
repeat with i from 1 to count
PowerMail ignores Re: when sorting by subject. Could it also ignore Fwd:
please?
If I have a folder with the following emails:
Fwd: Wibble
Re: Fwd: Wibble
Re: Wibble
Something else
PowerMail will sort:
Fwd: Wibble
Re: Fwd: Wibble
Something else
Re: Wibble
Note: "Re: Wibble" may be a reply to
17 matches
Mail list logo
