Re: HTML mail comparison PM vs AM

2008-06-20 Thread Sean McBride
cheshirekat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2008-6-19 5:09 PM said: Isn't your HTML showing as an attachment in PowerMail? Did you look at his screenshots? There was an attachment. That's his point. I'll repeat his words: PowerMail shows me a totally blank message with a html attachment, with no

Re: MobileMe and Push-eMail

2008-06-20 Thread Sean McBride
MB ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 2008-6-20 6:54 PM said: Well, Apple currently provides developers with a .Mac SDK, so they may expand it to cover these new features. Or not. We'll see. And if CTM knows, they're under NDA. But 3rd Party developers will always be behind Apple in this regard, since of

Re: HTML mail comparison PM vs AM

2008-06-20 Thread PowerMail Engineering
Dave N wrote: Look at the difference between the 2 programs viewing the SAME EXACT EMAIL. PowerMail shows me a totally blank message with a html attachment, with no provision for viewing the message. It's just blank. Lame. AppleMail shows me the message so I can read it. Obviously this is

Re: MobileMe and Push-eMail

2008-06-20 Thread PowerMail Engineering
Sean McBride wrote: Well, I sorta agree. It's hard to compete with Apple since they make the OS too. But email is an essential feature and Mac OS should come with a mail client. But CTM is to blame too, they haven't been keeping PM up to date. It still doesn't even have sheets, a feature

Re: HTML mail comparison PM vs AM

2008-06-20 Thread Michael Lewis
Sean McBride sez: The email had _two italicised words_ and for that PowerMail needs to launch a 3rd Party application to show the message. Lame. This happens to me all the time too. Are we sure that the email in question followed the proper protocols for HTML mail? I bet it didn't if the HTML

Re: HTML mail comparison PM vs AM

2008-06-20 Thread Dave N
Hi Jérôme, Thanks for the explanation. It always helps to understand the problem. Whether we all like it or not, html mail is becoming more common, not less. So let's look forward to a solution. Would it be possible to let Webkit provide the services to view the html message within PowerMail?

powermail-discuss Digest #2846 - 06/20/08

2008-06-20 Thread PowerMail discussions
powermail-discuss Digest #2846 - Friday, June 20, 2008 HTML mail comparison PM vs AM by Dave N [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: MobileMe and Push-eMail by MB [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: MobileMe and Push-eMail by MB [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Review of Power Mail by MB

Re: MobileMe and Push-eMail

2008-06-20 Thread Steve Tarpin
I've avoided Apple's Mail application, having been an avid PowerMail user for 10-years now (since May of 1999) That's 9-years though. Picky-Pickerton, so I'm not big on detail, don't let that distract you from the point. The Cloud are awfully tempting. The Cloud is the direction of the future

Re: MobileMe and Push-eMail

2008-06-20 Thread Steve Tarpin
So, yes, PM is not fully up to date with Mac OS. But doing so would require to spend 95% of our time rewriting things just to be up to date. We chose to be up to date for important things (Mac OS 9 - Mac OS X, PPC - intel...), but not for things that require a lot of work for a minor feature

Re: MobileMe and Push-eMail

2008-06-20 Thread Ben Kennedy
Steve Tarpin wrote at 6:04 PM (-0400) on 6/20/08: I'm really curious about the future of push services and what your (and other's) take might be. Pardon me if I'm coming late to the party here, but from what I've gathered, push in this context simply means IMAP; is that correct? And the salient