Re(2): Reindexing spam bug. WAS: Bug or Needed feature in Powermail

2005-10-21 Thread Alan Harper
I don't think it is pure html. It looks like text only. I sent the original message to Jérôme. At Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:19:16 +0200 PowerMail Engineering wrote: >Alan Harper wrote: > >>Reindexing spam does not seem to work on my PowerMail. >> >>I have a spam message that is promoting the company "

Re: Reindexing spam bug. WAS: Bug or Needed feature in Powermail

2005-10-21 Thread PowerMail Engineering
Alan Harper wrote: >Reindexing spam does not seem to work on my PowerMail. > >I have a spam message that is promoting the company "Allixon". Is this message a pure HTML message (with no plain text version)? If so, it is not indexed, wether it has been identified as spam or not. Jérôme - PowerM

Reindexing spam bug. WAS: Bug or Needed feature in Powermail

2005-10-21 Thread Alan Harper
Jérôme: Reindexing spam does not seem to work on my PowerMail. I have a spam message that is promoting the company "Allixon". My filter is: Spam: actions Filter incoming messages Conditions: Spam rating is high Actions: Move message into folder: Spam Don't no

Re: Bug or Needed feature in Powermail

2005-10-20 Thread PowerMail Engineering
Mikael Byström wrote: >I disagree with this. It's not logical. What if someone wants to keep >certain spam messages, say those that were reported, in a separate >folder, not in the spam folder? Why should it follow that those messages >should be indexed, unless specifically set to? >I used to kee

Re: Bug or Needed feature in Powermail

2005-10-20 Thread PowerMail Engineering
Alan Harper wrote: >Thanks. I suggest that PowerMail should act as follows: > >If "When manually moving a message out of Spam folder: Mark it as good" >is checked, then moving it out of the spam folder should do the same as >"mark as good". > >At Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:23:33 +0200 PowerMail Engineer

Re: Bug or Needed feature in Powermail

2005-10-19 Thread Mikael Byström
Alan Harper said: >If "When manually moving a message out of Spam folder: Mark it as good" >is checked, then moving it out of the spam folder should do the same as >"mark as good". I disagree with this. It's not logical. What if someone wants to keep certain spam messages, say those that were re

Re(2): Bug or Needed feature in Powermail

2005-10-19 Thread Alan Harper
Thanks. I suggest that PowerMail should act as follows: If "When manually moving a message out of Spam folder: Mark it as good" is checked, then moving it out of the spam folder should do the same as "mark as good". If you agree, put it on the bug list. Adding an "index item" to the filter acti

Re: Bug or Needed feature in Powermail

2005-10-18 Thread PowerMail Engineering
Alan Harper wrote: >The problem is that when a message is incorrectly identified as spam, >and I move it out of the spam folder (either by dragging it out or using >the "Mark As Good" menu item), the item is not then indexed, and there >appears to be no way to get the message indexed. The messag

Re: Bug or Needed feature in Powermail

2005-10-18 Thread listes
Alan Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem is that when a message is incorrectly identified as spam, > and I move it out of the spam folder (either by dragging it out or using > the "Mark As Good" menu item), the item is not then indexed, and there > appears to be no way to get the mess

Bug or Needed feature in Powermail

2005-10-17 Thread Alan Harper
PowerMail 5.2.1 MacOS 10.2.4 I have a filter for spam that says: Filter: Spam: actions Filter incoming messages Conditions: If Spam rating is high Actions: Move message into folder : Spam Don't notify new message Don't show in Recent Mail