Re: Feature request: "Reply to list" command

Rene Merz wrote: >Am 25.11.2004 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben: > >>>But if list daddies or moms are too lazy to format the list in a proper >>>way - why PM should do the work of them? >> >>For the benefit of PM users? > >I read several (good working) lists and have no need for. >Ask your list

Re: Feature request: "Reply to list" command

Am 25.11.2004 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben: >>But if list daddies or moms are too lazy to format the list in a proper >>way - why PM should do the work of them? > >For the benefit of PM users? I read several (good working) lists and have no need for. Ask your list administrators to do a bet

Re: Feature request: "Reply to list" command

Rene Merz (25/11/04 10:18 am) said: >If you install a directory, named ListName and a filter ListName who >identifies all ListName-mails and brings them to that directory - your >problem is solved. You just can reply to any ListName-mail and your mail >goes allways to the right (list-)address. I

Re: Feature request: "Reply to list" command

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>What would be really nice IMO is a preference option so that any reply to >>a list message is automatically directed to the list, regardless of >>whether the reply-to header has been set to do this. > >Right. Perhaps the answer is do be able to designate which addresses

Re: Feature request: "Reply to list" command

On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:22:26 +, Jeremy Hughes wrote: >What would be really nice IMO is a preference option so that any reply to >a list message is automatically directed to the list, regardless of >whether the reply-to header has been set to do this. Right. Perhaps the answer is do be able t

Re: Feature request: "Reply to list" command

Jeremy Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Tue, Nov 23, 2004 06:22 said: >However, the situation is that many lists (unlike this one) do not set >the reply-to header so that messages go back to the list. So regardless >of our personal preferences for list behaviour, it would be useful to >have a Reply

Re: Feature request: "Reply to list" command

Shane Stanley (22/11/04 7:10 am) said: >>Many mailing lists (like this one) set the 'reply-to' header so that >>messages go back to the list. This is bad > >... in some people's *opinion*. > >>see: > >Less than convincing, IMO. I agree. For the o

Re: Feature request: "Reply to list" command

Richard Hart sez: >I agree. PowerMail makes this very clear and simple to do. An extra >button would just clutter the tool bar. Agreed, but an editable toolbar would make everyone happy, especially if you could add AppleScripts in it. -

Re: Feature request: "Reply to list" command

Shane Stanley wrote: >... in some people's *opinion*. > >>see: > >Less than convincing, IMO. I agree. PowerMail makes this very clear and simple to do. An extra button would just clutter the tool bar. RH

Re: Feature request: "Reply to list" command

Shane Stanley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Mon, Nov 22, 2004 02:10 said: >On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 01:14:45 -0500, Sean McBride wrote: > >>Many mailing lists (like this one) set the 'reply-to' header so that >>messages go back to the list. This is bad > >... in some people's *opinion*. Yes, of course... t

Re: Feature request: "Reply to list" command

le Mon, 22 Nov 2004 01:14:45 -0500, Sean McBride a écrit : >Many mailing lists (like this one) set the 'reply-to' header so that >messages go back to the list. This is bad, see: > I found this : >Reasonable mail programs have two separate "reply"

Re: Feature request: "Reply to list" command

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 01:14:45 -0500, Sean McBride wrote: >Many mailing lists (like this one) set the 'reply-to' header so that >messages go back to the list. This is bad ... in some people's *opinion*. >see: Less than convincing, IMO. -- Shane

Feature request: "Reply to list" command

Hi all, Many mailing lists (like this one) set the 'reply-to' header so that messages go back to the list. This is bad, see: It can also lead to user errors, like accidently thinking you've replied privately, yet replied publicly (yes, I just did