Interesting thread.
I just sent totally formatted RTF mail from Outlook on Win2K to my PM
account, and it arrived as text/plain. Even the source shows no trace of RTF.
Hm...
--
- Hiro
[PROTECTED]
<[PROTECTED]> <[PROTECTED]>
>This is slightly off topic, but back in the days when I used to use
>Eudora I recall that in between the options for sending email either as
>Plain Text or as HTML, there was a middle option: Rich Text. As I
>remember it, this allowed basic text formatting (Bold, italic, increase
>size etc) but n
Hi all,
This is something that I have always thought would be a halfway house
between those wanting some form of formatting - bold, underline etc and
those who want the full HTML gamut of pictures and fancy fonts.
I've never quite understood why mail clients in general do not use a
limited RTF i
>reject HTML mail on grounds of it being potentially harmful spam. My
>question, therefore, (you knew I'd get around to it eventually, right?)
>is this: Does Rich Text email suffer from the same fate. If I were to
>send out promotional email with bold headings, would there be the same
>chance of i
Hi gang;
This is slightly off topic, but back in the days when I used to use
Eudora I recall that in between the options for sending email either as
Plain Text or as HTML, there was a middle option: Rich Text. As I
remember it, this allowed basic text formatting (Bold, italic, increase
size etc)
5 matches
Mail list logo
