Re: PM & SS

2004-04-20 Thread Max Gossell
At Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:19:45 +0200 (CET), Max Gossell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >At Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:52:43 +0200 (CET), Christian Roth ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Per Åström wrote: >> >>>When I mark a message as good that was labeled spam by SS the color is >>>still red. Is it possible to

Re: PM & SS

2004-04-20 Thread Max Gossell
At Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:52:43 +0200 (CET), Christian Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Per Åström wrote: > >>When I mark a message as good that was labeled spam by SS the color is >>still red. Is it possible to get it in black after marked as good? Maybe >>there is a preference I've missed? > >I so

Re: PM & SS

2004-04-20 Thread Christian Roth
Per Åström wrote: >When I mark a message as good that was labeled spam by SS the color is >still red. Is it possible to get it in black after marked as good? Maybe >there is a preference I've missed? I solved this by adding a filter at the top of the filter list setting the label to none (not st

Re: PM & SS

2004-04-20 Thread Per �str
>>When I mark a message as good that was labeled spam by SS the color is >>still red. Is it possible to get it in black after marked as good? Maybe >>there is a preference I've missed? > >You should no longer use the SpamSieve AppleScripts with PM5; the >integrated SpamSieve filter will set the s

Re: PM & SS

2004-04-20 Thread Max Gossell
At Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:19:54 +0200 (CET), PowerMail Engineering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Per Åström wrote: > >>When I mark a message as good that was labeled spam by SS the color is >>still red. Is it possible to get it in black after marked as good? Maybe >>there is a preference I've missed?

Re: PM & SS

2004-04-20 Thread PowerMail Engineering
Per Åström wrote: >When I mark a message as good that was labeled spam by SS the color is >still red. Is it possible to get it in black after marked as good? Maybe >there is a preference I've missed? You should no longer use the SpamSieve AppleScripts with PM5; the integrated SpamSieve filter wi

Re: PM & SS

2004-04-20 Thread Max Gossell
At Tue, 20 Apr 2004 12:58:32 +0200 (CET), Per Åström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >>The new mark as good / mark as spam toolbar buttons (and menu items) will >>train SpamSieve, when you have activated SpamSieve from the spam filter >>assistant. They will also set the spam rating of the message

Re: PM & SS

2004-04-20 Thread Per �str
> >The new mark as good / mark as spam toolbar buttons (and menu items) will >train SpamSieve, when you have activated SpamSieve from the spam filter >assistant. They will also set the spam rating of the message, and do >whatever action is configured in the new "mark as spam" preference pane. >

Re: PM & SS

2004-04-19 Thread PowerMail Engineering
Anthony Sanna wrote: >Is SS part of PM5? Does it still run as a separate application? Still a separate application, that can work with other mail clients. >When I installed PM5, I got a dialog that my SS scripts were out of date >and did I want to update them - I clicked "yes". >after updating

PM & SS

2004-04-19 Thread Anthony Sanna
I'm curious about the (new) relationship between SpamSieve and PM5. Questions... Is SS part of PM5? Does it still run as a separate application? When I installed PM5, I got a dialog that my SS scripts were out of date and did I want to update them - I clicked "yes". BTW: My version of SS prio