On Oct 15, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
The 2 and 11 are the numbers of messages in the corpus (i.e. the ones
you've trained it with).
I didn't train it with any messages - these are messages that
SpamSieve
has filtered (the current totals are 50 good and 112 spam).
You did, in
Michael Tsai (15/10/08, 16:04) said:
>> But as you can see from my last email, SpamSieve is filtering mail (2
>> Good Messages, 11 Spam Messages) but failing to report this in the
>> Filtered Mail and SpamSieve Accuracy sections.
>
>The 2 and 11 are the numbers of messages in the corpus (i.e. the
Michael Tsai (15/10/08, 16:30) said:
>> I wonder if the problem is caused by the fact that SpamSieve's
>> History.db file has got quite large (122.9 MB).
>
>The size doesn't matter, but it sounds like the file is damaged. You
>could either start a new one (hold Command-Option when launching
>SpamS
On Oct 15, 2008, at 8:46 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
But as you can see from my last email, SpamSieve is filtering mail (2
Good Messages, 11 Spam Messages) but failing to report this in the
Filtered Mail and SpamSieve Accuracy sections.
The 2 and 11 are the numbers of messages in the corpus (i.e.
On Oct 15, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
I reset the corpus earlier today, because it had got large and I
thought
this might be causing the Statistics problem.
There is no relation between corpus size and the statistics.
I wonder if the problem is caused by the fact that SpamSiev
Michael Tsai (15/10/08, 14:34) said:
>> Is the Statistics window in SpamSieve 2.7.1 broken?
>
>No. Only you can know whether the statistics shown match reality, but
>most likely they do. What it says is that SpamSieve has not been asked
>to filter any messages since yesterday at noon.
SpamSieve i
Hi Michael,
>> Showing Statistics Since
>> 14/10/2008 12:00
>
>Maybe you should set the date to a year ago or so. You are looking at
>the statistics for just one day.
It makes no difference.
I reset the corpus and deleted some rules earlier today.
But as you can see from my last email, SpamSiev
On Oct 15, 2008, at 7:51 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
Is the Statistics window in SpamSieve 2.7.1 broken?
No. Only you can know whether the statistics shown match reality, but
most likely they do. What it says is that SpamSieve has not been asked
to filter any messages since yesterday at noon.
Is the Statistics window in SpamSieve 2.7.1 broken?
Mine shows:
Filtered Mail
0 Good Messages
0 Spam Messages
0 Spam Messages Per Day
SpamSieve Accuracy
0 False Positives
0 False Negatives
0.0% Correct
Corpus
2 Good Messages
11 Spam Messages (85%)
1,009 Total Words
Rules
6,354 Blocklist Rules
Jeremy Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Showing Statistics Since
> 14/10/2008 12:00
Maybe you should set the date to a year ago or so. You are looking at
the statistics for just one day.
- Michael
Michael J. Hußmann
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW (personal): http://michael-hussmann.de
WWW (
10 matches
Mail list logo