Re: SpamSieve Statistics

2008-10-15 Thread Michael Tsai
On Oct 15, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: The 2 and 11 are the numbers of messages in the corpus (i.e. the ones you've trained it with). I didn't train it with any messages - these are messages that SpamSieve has filtered (the current totals are 50 good and 112 spam). You did, in

Re: SpamSieve Statistics

2008-10-15 Thread Jeremy Hughes
Michael Tsai (15/10/08, 16:04) said: >> But as you can see from my last email, SpamSieve is filtering mail (2 >> Good Messages, 11 Spam Messages) but failing to report this in the >> Filtered Mail and SpamSieve Accuracy sections. > >The 2 and 11 are the numbers of messages in the corpus (i.e. the

Re: SpamSieve Statistics

2008-10-15 Thread Jeremy Hughes
Michael Tsai (15/10/08, 16:30) said: >> I wonder if the problem is caused by the fact that SpamSieve's >> History.db file has got quite large (122.9 MB). > >The size doesn't matter, but it sounds like the file is damaged. You >could either start a new one (hold Command-Option when launching >SpamS

Re: SpamSieve Statistics

2008-10-15 Thread Michael Tsai
On Oct 15, 2008, at 8:46 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: But as you can see from my last email, SpamSieve is filtering mail (2 Good Messages, 11 Spam Messages) but failing to report this in the Filtered Mail and SpamSieve Accuracy sections. The 2 and 11 are the numbers of messages in the corpus (i.e.

Re: SpamSieve Statistics

2008-10-15 Thread Michael Tsai
On Oct 15, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: I reset the corpus earlier today, because it had got large and I thought this might be causing the Statistics problem. There is no relation between corpus size and the statistics. I wonder if the problem is caused by the fact that SpamSiev

Re: SpamSieve Statistics

2008-10-15 Thread Jeremy Hughes
Michael Tsai (15/10/08, 14:34) said: >> Is the Statistics window in SpamSieve 2.7.1 broken? > >No. Only you can know whether the statistics shown match reality, but >most likely they do. What it says is that SpamSieve has not been asked >to filter any messages since yesterday at noon. SpamSieve i

Re: SpamSieve Statistics

2008-10-15 Thread Jeremy Hughes
Hi Michael, >> Showing Statistics Since >> 14/10/2008 12:00 > >Maybe you should set the date to a year ago or so. You are looking at >the statistics for just one day. It makes no difference. I reset the corpus and deleted some rules earlier today. But as you can see from my last email, SpamSiev

Re: SpamSieve Statistics

2008-10-15 Thread Michael Tsai
On Oct 15, 2008, at 7:51 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: Is the Statistics window in SpamSieve 2.7.1 broken? No. Only you can know whether the statistics shown match reality, but most likely they do. What it says is that SpamSieve has not been asked to filter any messages since yesterday at noon.

SpamSieve Statistics

2008-10-15 Thread Jeremy Hughes
Is the Statistics window in SpamSieve 2.7.1 broken? Mine shows: Filtered Mail 0 Good Messages 0 Spam Messages 0 Spam Messages Per Day SpamSieve Accuracy 0 False Positives 0 False Negatives 0.0% Correct Corpus 2 Good Messages 11 Spam Messages (85%) 1,009 Total Words Rules 6,354 Blocklist Rules

Re: SpamSieve Statistics

2008-10-15 Thread Michael J . Hußmann
Jeremy Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Showing Statistics Since > 14/10/2008 12:00 Maybe you should set the date to a year ago or so. You are looking at the statistics for just one day. - Michael Michael J. Hußmann E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW (personal): http://michael-hussmann.de WWW (