Hello
in the last four weeks SS has been changing spam ratings to messages
coming from historical senders which have never been identified as
spammers and now, they suddenly are. There are also a number of members
from a yahoo group which are regularly labeled with a minimum spam rate.
After mark
>...Many spam those which should had been caught are now missed, while a few
>legit ones are marked SPAM and sent to Spam folders almost every day.
>- Hiro
Hiro, I can confirm the same thing happening to me to
Giovanni
>>There are also a number of members from a yahoo group which
>>are regularly labeled with a minimum spam rate. After marking
>>them as good, SS keeps marking them with a slight spam rate.
>
>If the yahoo group filter is before the SpamSieve filters and files them
>into their proper destination,
>Many spam those which should had been caught are now missed, while a few
>legit ones are marked SPAM and sent to Spam folders almost every day.
For months, mine has been doing this. It was almost like going back to
day one.
Tony
--
Anthony R. Sanna
SACO Foods, Inc.
1-800-373-7226
[EMAIL PROTE
Michael Tsai sez:
>
>> It'll be interesting to see how this holds up as I run it more and the
>> corpus and rules grow. Maybe it would be a good thing to rebuild the
>> corpus and rules once a year?
>
>It's not necessary or particularly helpful to clean out the rules,
>though you can if you wan
On May 17, 2005, at 10:22 AM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
>> in the last four weeks SS has been changing spam ratings to messages
>> coming from historical senders which have never been identified as
>> spammers and now, they suddenly are.
>
> I am glad I am not alone! I reported this a month ago, whi
By the way, I was going to mention the "Prune Corpus" command but decided
to look up more info about it. Ends up it has been removed from the
latest version of SpamSieve:
> ยท Removed the Prune Corpus command. With auto-training being much
>smarter than in earlier versions, it's almost
In response to Giovanni Andreani, A-NO-NE Music sez:
>I asked to this list, which got no response back then, that I suspected
>if this is caused by database off-balance. I add more Mark As Spam
>every day, while I don't do Mark As Good as often, and if I am doing
>this wrong.
Maybe this isn't t
On May 17, 2005, at 6:07 AM, Giovanni Andreani wrote:
> There are also a number of members
> from a yahoo group which are regularly labeled with a minimum spam
> rate.
> After marking them as good, SS keeps marking them with a slight spam
> rate.
Please send your SpamSieve Log file to me at <[
Giovanni Andreani / 2005/05/17 / 06:07 AM wrote:
>in the last four weeks SS has been changing spam ratings to messages
>coming from historical senders which have never been identified as
>spammers and now, they suddenly are.
I am glad I am not alone! I reported this a month ago, which seems t
>There are also a number of members from a yahoo group which
>are regularly labeled with a minimum spam rate. After marking
>them as good, SS keeps marking them with a slight spam rate.
If the yahoo group filter is before the SpamSieve filters and files them
into their proper destination, do yo
11 matches
Mail list logo
