Thanks a lot Murphy; really appreciate!!!
Cheers,,,
Talal
> On Jan 12, 2015, at 7:19 PM, Murphy McCauley
> wrote:
>
> See inline.
>
>> On Jan 12, 2015, at 1:04 AM, TALAL AL-HARBI wrote:
>>
>> I added a print statement to spanning tree code:
>>
>> # Now modify ports as needed
>> try:
>>
See inline.
On Jan 12, 2015, at 1:04 AM, TALAL AL-HARBI wrote:
> I added a print statement to spanning tree code:
>
> # Now modify ports as needed
> try:
> change_count = 0
> for sw, ports in tree.iteritems():
> con = core.openflow.getConnection(sw)
> if con is None: conti
Dear Murphy
After the connection is established, ports status set to false expect those who
are between switches and no correcting a loop even ports where hosts attached
to.
I have printed ports status with basic topology:
Ports s1-eth1:1 --> where host1 attached to
Flood False
Ports s
I don't have enough information to understand or evaluate the information
you've given about port status. Where does it come from? Are you querying the
switch, or is it from one of the datastructures in spanning_tree.py, or
something else? When are you printing it?
And what options are you u
