Hi Richard,
This adds a lot of clarity, thanks.
On 18 February 2011 00:27, Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz wrote:
On 18/02/2011, at 3:55 AM, alex wrote:
Ian Bogost starts off by arguing that learning a programming language
shouldn't meet a curricular requirement for learning a natural
Folks,
There have been tasks looking at using different techniques for concurrent
and parallel programming.
I posted one example to the Lambda the Ultimate front page a few months
ago. Please see Is Transactional Programming Actually Easier?:
http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/4070
Something
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Russel Winder rus...@russel.org.ukwrote:
Prompted by various discussions elsewhere, I am on the search for recent
experimental results and/or people doing or about to do experiments.
The questions all relate to the models of parallel software:
shared-memory
Sorry to the group if that last e-mail came off as rant'ish.
I think some focus on studies would be nice, but why does it feel like (to
me) that we are aimlessly picking this versus that studies?
I would start instead by using expert knowledge, and work from there. For
example, parallelism
