Hello,
A lot of discussion related to naming can be found in the
following documents.
http://www.naturalprogramming.com/to_read/doctoral_thesis_of_kari_laitinen.pdf
http://www.naturalprogramming.com/to_read/estimating_understandability_etc.pdf
I think the discussion is still valid although the
>> The definition of 'language' depends on who you are talking to.
I think that based on this discussion and earlier
discussions, it is not always clear what the term
"programming language" means. From the compilation
point of view the term is clear, i.e., the lexical
rules and the syntax of the
Richard O'Keefe wrote:
If you came across a sentence written using English syntax and
closed-class words but Japanese open class words, would it
still be English?
According to the theory that I have presented in
http://www.naturalprogramming.com/to_read/estimating_understandability_etc.pdf
suc
Hello All,
To respond to the previous discussion related
to programming languages and natural languages,
I decided to start a new discussion. My purpose
here is to explain a kind of language theory that I
developed quite many years ago.
A classic book about the C programming language
begins wit
below that, semi-conductor fabrication. Or above all of it, variables
which persist values during execution. Which is best?
-Original Message-----
From: Kari Laitinen [mailto:kari.laiti...@oamk.fi]
Sent: 07 April 2009 10:50
To: Bennett Kankuzi
Cc: Ppig-Discuss-List
Subject: Re:
.
Kari Laitinen
School of Engineering
Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Finland
Bennett Kankuzi wrote:
Dear All,
Many thanks to everyone for taking your time to air out your views on
the question I had posted on the forum. For now I will use C since the
students
