On 24/02/2011, at 5:18 AM, alex wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the illuminating response,
On 22 February 2011 03:39, Andrew Walenstein walen...@ieee.org wrote:
Even if you don't like these two arguments, surely most would admit that
*one* of the primary purposes of good programming
On 22/02/2011, at 4:39 PM, Andrew Walenstein wrote:
http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/DeCSS/Gallery/decss-haiku.txt
This page provides Haiku versions of the DeCSS DVD decryption algorithm. The
DeCSS code was put on t-shirts and into dramatic reading and into Haiku.
Many people did this because
Hi Richard,
This adds a lot of clarity, thanks.
On 18 February 2011 00:27, Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz wrote:
On 18/02/2011, at 3:55 AM, alex wrote:
Ian Bogost starts off by arguing that learning a programming language
shouldn't meet a curricular requirement for learning a natural
It does sound as though there's a category confusion there.
There's clearly a range of things that have a strong family
resemblance. We have
Spoken human languages. Signed human languages.
Written human languages.
Invented human languages like Esperanto and lojban.
