http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2010/979/sc91.htm

31 December 2009 - 6 January 2010
Issue No. 979
Published in Cairo by AL-AHRAM established in 1875

'An issue of identity'

Gihan Shahine examines how the religious fervour now sweeping Egyptian society 
will stay on until further notice 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Click to view caption 
      Masses of worshippers performing their Eid prayers 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
     
In the small hours of the Eid Al-Adha, one can hardly ignore the masses of 
worshippers rushing to mosques to perform their prayers. Once the prayers are 
over, people greet each other warmly and children hurry to distribute sweets to 
poorer children. Worshippers rush to slaughter sheep in order to feed the poor. 

In Ramadan, the mosques are even more crowded with worshippers and acts of 
charity even more in evidence. Just go into the street before the devout break 
their fasts in Ramadan, and you will find charity tables on almost every street 
corner serving free meals to the poor, while people race to hand out dates and 
juice to those who have not been able to catch Iftar at home. 

Religious tapes are bestsellers in Egypt, and it is estimated that up to 80 per 
cent of women are now wearing the veil. Orphanages and government hospitals are 
flooded with alms, while many children and adults are opting to attend the 
sermons and Quran classes that dot almost every mosque in Egypt. Reciting the 
Holy Quran is a common activity among passengers on public transport, while 
posters carrying religious slogans are all over the place -- in clubs, on 
public transport, in schools and at universities.

Such scenes of piety are perhaps one reason why a recent Gallup poll has ranked 
Egypt the most religious country in the world, followed by Bangladesh and Sri 
Lanka, with 100 per cent of respondents saying that religion occupies an 
important place in their lives. 

"An Islamic revival is reshaping Egypt and other Arab countries in ways beyond 
violent politics," writes journalist Caryle Murphy in Passion for Islam: 
Shaping the Modern Middle East. In her attempt to explore Islam's contemporary 
revival through her observations of Egyptians encountered during her five years 
as Washington Post Cairo bureau chief, Murphy concludes that "just as the Nile 
runs through Egypt for almost eight hundred miles, giving it life, so also the 
Straight Way, the way of Allah, runs through it, beckoning its people. The 
search by Egypt's Muslims for a modern understanding of the Straight Way is the 
essence of today's passion for Islam." 

Many would agree with prominent writer and expert on Islamic affairs Fahmy 
Howeidy that a wave of religiosity has swept Egyptian society since the 1967 
setback in particular, when people resorted to religion as an outlet for their 
political frustrations. "That was the time when Sufism boomed in Egypt," 
Howeidy said. An Islamic revival ensued, and in Howeidy's view this "occurred 
as a natural evolution in the course of history and is an issue that is too 
complicated to be attributed to any one single reason."

Whereas some analysts might explain religious devotion as an outlet for 
people's political and economic frustration -- as a kind of personal solace at 
a time when unemployment and poverty are rife and when political and human 
rights are curtailed -- Howeidy would rather see it as "an issue of identity". 

"The Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979 provided an example of how people could 
fight despotism and achieve liberty through adhering to an Islamic identity," 
Howeidy said in an interview with Al-Ahram Weekly. The Palestinian-Israeli 
conflict has also perhaps deepened religious fervour across the Middle East and 
made people more attached to an Islamic identity as a symbol of resistance.

But whether Egyptians are religious in the true sense of the word remains an 
issue of public debate, since some would also argue that at the same time as 
religious fervour is taking Egyptian society by storm, corruption is also 
taking an unprecedented toll. Secularists and leftists are among the staunchest 
critics of the current religious fervour, which has also swept through Egypt's 
estimated 10 million Coptic Christians, arguing that it has created tensions 
that are a far cry from the cosmopolitan Egypt of the 1960s.

Yet, any answer to the question of whether Egyptians are truly religious or not 
"depends on how you define religiosity," according to Samir Naim, a professor 
of sociology at Ain Shams University in Cairo. On the level of observing 
religious rituals, Egyptians may perhaps appear to be more religious than they 
were a decade or more ago. Mosques and churches are full of worshippers, 
charitable acts are more common, and more people fast and go on pilgrimages.

"But if we look at public ethics and people's personal conduct, which lie at 
the core of any religion, then religiosity may almost have reached zero point," 
Naim comments. 

His argument is based on the fact that "corruption is rife in almost all 
domains of life. Bribery has become the rule of the day. People hardly work, or 
take pride in their work, and they are suffering from the onslaughts of 
poverty, oppression, lack of democracy and social justice, nepotism, child 
labour, sexual harassment and the whole economic, social and political system." 

The worst results of all this, in Naim's view, is that people tend to observe 
superficialities or are attracted to extremist views. Naim is a staunch critic 
of the spread of the hijab and niqab among women, which he describes as a 
symbol of "pretentious" rather than "genuine" religiosity. His argument is 
close to that of many secularists. "If you look back at Egypt half a century 
ago, you would not find a single veiled woman and yet ethics and morals were 
much better, and there was no such thing as sexual harassment," he says.

For Howeidy, however, the recent rise in incidents of sexual harassment and 
corruption in Egypt is the result of other social ailments and it cannot be 
taken as a pretext to abandon modesty and religion. "Young men are already prey 
to a wave of nudity on satellite television channels, and this has come at the 
same time as unemployment is rife, the economy is bad, education is corrupt, 
and in the absence of any example to follow," Howeidy argues.

The fact that corruption is on the rise does not mean that people are not truly 
religious or that religiosity is superficial, he says. After all, "we are in a 
country of 80 million people, and in the same way that there are people who are 
corrupt, there are also other people who are truly religious. There is no study 
that shows that corruption is prevalent among those who appear to be pious." 

"Those who are corrupt and are stealing the country's funds mostly fall into 
the category of the political elite, away from worshippers and mosque- 
frequenters," he says. Men who harass girls in the streets are definitely not 
among those who pray in mosques. "If those people who appear to be religious 
prove to be deviant, then there must be something wrong with their 
understanding of religion and the prevalent religious discourse and not the 
religion itself," Howeidy says.

For Sarah, a strictly veiled housewife, "people sometimes think that those who 
appear to be religious are angels, but we are all human beings, and, as such, 
we can still sink into sin in our attempt to follow the path of Allah. There is 
no utopia on earth." However, there might be a problem in understandings of 
religion itself since, as Sheikh Gamal Qotb, former head of Al-Azhar's fatwa 
committee, puts it, "the Islamic revival has been rather sudden and 
unsophisticated."

"We sometimes see women, for instance, wearing the veil without fully 
understanding the values it stands for -- in other words, that they should 
first purify their tongues, minds and hearts before they succumb to God's 
religious obligations and cover their heads," Qotb explains.

A superficial understanding of religion of this sort could be "a reaction to 
the media's antagonism towards whatever is Islamic," Qotb says. "This animosity 
on the part of the media has backfired on people who have decided to defend 
their religion and themselves in ways they see as possible, even if this means 
only adopting religious symbols such as the hijab or wearing beards."

For his part, Howeidy concurs that the discourse the state tries to spread is 
one that sees religion as being confined to the performance of rituals, in 
other words a discourse that "confines religion to mosques, outside of which 
people are encouraged to do whatever they want." 

According to Moataz-Bellah Abdel-Fattah, an expert on Middle Eastern politics 
and Islamic studies and a professor of political science at Central Michigan 
University in the US and Cairo University in Egypt, this discourse is often 
adopted by secular leftists, and it is one that "limits Islam to the personal 
domain, depriving it of any role as far as legislation and political action are 
concerned."

At a time when people are looking to religion to provide an outlet for their 
disappointment at the government's failures to improve quality of life, 
Al-Azhar, the Sunni Muslim world's most prestigious seat of learning, is 
perhaps losing its credibility with the public and is being perceived as merely 
the mouthpiece of the government. 

According to Qotb, this has left a vacuum into which religious waves can flow.

Sufism has proliferated, and Shia and Wahhabi trends have gained popularity. 
For Qotb, the danger of these "foreign schools of thinking resides in the fact 
that they were born in other cultures. As such, they carry thoughts that are 
sometimes alien to Egyptian society."

"Religious edicts should be grounded in the environment of the society in which 
they are born, and as such should conform to both time and place," Qotb said. 
Some of these religious discourses also tend to focus on the ritualistic part 
of religion at the expense of the broader meaning of religious observance, and 
this has reflected in public withdrawal from political participation and 
cultural activities, Qotb says.

The fact that some of these schools of thought "reduce religion to issues of 
the niqab, beard and galabiya makes those who belong to them feel outside their 
own society and causes them to indulge in fantasies of other societies more in 
line with their ways of thinking," Qotb says.

He adds that such people may now have little faith in Al-Azhar, and their 
feelings of alienation have sometimes driven them to seek solutions in foreign 
forms of Islam, such as Shiism. Meanwhile, "the propaganda surrounding Sufism 
has lent it further popularity, which again is dangerous since it encourages 
its followers to close themselves off in mosques and to devote themselves to 
ritual practices without becoming involved in the wider society," Qotb says. 

By contrast, in his book Islam without Fear, the American writer Raymond 
William Baker refers to a new trend of wassatiya, "a movement [which] rejects 
both Islamist and secular extremists and offers a modern perspective of Islam 
that also departs from the traditionalists." 

This movement, spearheaded in Egypt by the late Mohamed El-Ghazali and adopted 
by such figures as Youssef El-Qaradawi, Ahmed Kamal Abul-Magd and Fahmy 
Howeidy, attempts to strike a balance between "Westernisers" and "those who 
feel threatened by this and retreat into Islamic movements. They are very 
opposed to individuals concentrating on their own personal reform and argue 
that societal reform should take a greater place."

A perhaps broader understanding of religion of this sort did indeed flourish in 
the late 1990s with the emergence of a new style of young lay preachers, the 
most prominent of whom was Amr Khaled, who adopted a discourse that attempted 
to reconcile Islam with modern lifestyles. This new discourse was seen as one 
reason behind the religious fervour that swept through young people of middle 
and upper-middle class origin, as well as behind the spread of the veil among 
women.

Khaled was the first Islamic televangelist whose moderate preaching, 
charismatic personality and clever use of barrier-breaking technology 
influenced the lives of millions of young Muslims across the world. His message 
has always been directed at young people and the higher strata of society, his 
discourse witnessing a gradual shift from a purely spiritual message of piety 
and devotion to God to social development based on faith, and most recently, to 
dialogue with the West. 

Khaled's religious discourse promotes social activism, job creation and 
development as the only means to fight despair, unemployment, extremism and 
injustice. Today, young people are told that giving up smoking, fighting drug 
addiction, cleaning the streets, planting their building rooftops, educating 
the public, and even engaging in fitness exercises are all part of the worship 
of God.

A discourse of this sort has been adopted by many other younger preachers, such 
as Mustafa Hosni and Moez Massoud, and, according to a study by the Danish 
Institute for International Studies, it has inspired an unprecedented boom in 
voluntary work by young people. 

The phenomenon of Muslim youth organisations appeared around the year 2000, and 
these engage young volunteers who "use Islam as inspiration and motivation for 
active engagement in society" and for changing and developing their countries. 

Such young people, according to the Danish study, "assign Islam an important 
role without applying the language of Political Islam, which propagates the 
establishment of an Islamic state. Instead, they view Islam as instrumental in 
helping the individual to become an active and useful citizen, and as a 
religion which is not confined to rituals, but one that promotes social 
activism, improving oneself and one's community."

Young people involved in such organisations were often inspired by Khaled's 
satellite TV programme "Life Makers", and they represent "a new and somewhat 
different understanding and application of Islam," the Danish study says, which 
focuses on making "Islam a natural part of [the volunteers' and their target 
groups'] daily lives." 

However, Khaled was banned from preaching in Egypt, as "was every moderate 
voice", Howeidy says. In the same way, "the Muslim Brotherhood was outlawed, 
and Al-Azhar was weakened by turning it into a government mouthpiece, leaving a 
vacuum that could easily be filled with distorted thoughts." 

On the prospects for religion in Egypt, Howeidy provides a dim outlook. "When 
lions are absent, monkeys jump in, and if this state of vacuum persists, we 
will be in a state of chaos -- a mishmash of all trends and schools of 
thought." 

For Naim, however, everything will depend on how far Egypt is able to develop 
economically, socially and politically. "Only if a national development project 
achieves prosperity, productivity and social justice, and only when health, 
education and housing services are improved, will religion be applied in its 
essence and Muslims be able to adhere to the true teachings of Islam," Naim 
said. 

Otherwise, he expects "morals to get worse and religion to be reduced to a 
matter of appearances and to serve as an outlet for people's frustrations."

Experts' viewpoints aside, a middle-aged veiled woman who talked to the Weekly 
on her way to a Quran lesson in one of the mosques in Nasr City, provided a 
different outlook, which may be that of many of those today attending the 
sermons in mosques.

"More and more children of the higher strata of society are now studying and 
memorising the Quran and, in the meantime are receiving quality education," she 
said. "I foresee a new generation of Muslims with a correct understanding of 
religion, who will be able to combine ethics, religious rituals and success in 
academic and professional life."


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke