MPAC JOINS CALLS FOR RELEASE OF AFGHAN CHRISTIAN 

(Washington, DC - 3/25/06) -- The Muslim Public Affairs Council today called on 
the Afghan government to release a man who is being threatened with death for 
converting from Islam to Christianity. 


Abdul Rahman was arrested in early February in the Afghan capital of Kabul 
after family members filed a complaint with the government, accusing him of 
rejecting Islam. Rahman, who lived in Germany for many years, became a 
Christian 16 years ago while working for an aid organization in Pakistan. He 
returned to Pakistan from Germany in order to obtain custody of his two 
daughters, who were being looked after by their grandmother. 


According to Afghanistan's constitution, minority religious rights are 
protected, but Muslims must follow Islam, the state religion. International 
scrutiny on this issue has cast sharia as clear-cut on the issue of apostasy -- 
a person who turns his/her back on Islam is an apostate and must be punished by 
death.  In reality, the "rules of Islam" are not codified, and the Quran 
mandates that religious freedom be respected. Furthermore, the Prophet Muhammad 
himself never sentenced an apostate to death. 


"While apostasy may be a sin in the eyes of God, it is not considered to be 
criminal behavior," Dr. Maher Hathout writes in his recent book "In Pursuit of 
Justice: The Jurisprudence of Human Rights in Islam" (available through 
Amazon.com). "We strongly oppose the state's use of coercion in regulating 
Islamic belief in such a manner, since faith is a matter of individual choice 
on which only God can adjudicate."  


The judge told Rahman that he could face the death penalty if he refused to 
become a Muslim again. However, the Quran states "There is no compulsion in 
religion, for the right way is clearly from the wrong way. Whoever therefore 
rejects the forces of evil and believes in God, he has taken hold of a support 
most unfailing, which shall never give way, for God is All Hearing and Knowing" 
(2:256). 


As is evident in the following passage from "In Pursuit of Justice", even 
Muslim governments acting in accordance with sharia, or Islamic law, have no 
authority to put people to death for renouncing Islam and/or converting to 
another faith: 

"Despite the fact that the Quran does not once mention the death penalty for 
apostasy, jurists have relied on two hadith texts for their argument. The first 
one states "whoever changes his religion shall be killed" (Abu Dawud). The 
second is "It is not lawful to kill a man who is a Muslim except for one of the 
three reasons: Kufr (disbelief) after accepting Islam, fornication after 
marriage, or wrongfully killing someone, for which he may be killed" (Abu 
Dawud). Notwithstanding the fact that the chain of transmission on the first 
hadith has been found to be weak, both of them contradict the Quran and other 
instances in which the Prophet did not compel anyone to embrace Islam, nor 
punish them if they recanted. 


"In one incident, the Prophet pardoned Abdullah bin Sa'd, after he renounced 
Islam. Abdullah bin Sa'd was one of the people chosen by the Prophet as a 
scribe, to write down Qur'anic text as it was revealed to the Prophet. After 
spending some time with the Muslims in Madina, he recanted and returned to the 
religion of the Quraish. When he was brought before the Prophet, Osman bin 
Affan pleaded on his behalf, and the Prophet subsequently pardoned Abdullah bin 
Sa'd (Ibn Hisham). 


"The problem with the argument for punishment for apostasy is that it cannot be 
applied in any Islamic state without giving rise to the potential for abuse by 
the state itself. Erroneously equating moral with political power in the 
determination of law has led to the political repression that we see in Islamic 
countries today. We must separate the right of God from that of man in defining 
freedom of religion as a legal right. The right of God refers only to the moral 
obligations of Muslims towards God, and is adjudicated by God.  The state 
cannot act as a coercive moral authority, in effect representing God's Will on 
earth, because it does not have the right to do so. In the context of freedom 
of religion, the state's responsibility is to uphold and protect it as the 
right of all humans, as granted by God, without exercising moral judgment on 
the content and/or manner of exercising those religious beliefs." 

Click here to view the chapter on "Freedom of Religion" from "In Pursuit of 
Justice", which examines the issue of apostasy in-depth. 





***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg 
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Reading only, http://dear.to/ppi 
4. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to